Kirsch v. Kings Credit Services
Filing
28
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Counsel to file proof of service on Plaintiff by 10/19/12. The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 10/16/2012. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2012)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
HEIDY KIRSCH,
6
7
8
Plaintiff,
NO. C12-0570 TEH
v.
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
KINGS CREDIT SERVICES,
9
Defendant.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
On August 27, 2012, this Court granted Todd M. Friedman’s motion to withdraw as
12 counsel for Plaintiff Heidy Kirsch, with the condition that papers shall “continue to be served
13 on counsel for forwarding purposes, unless and until the client appears by other counsel or
14 pro se.” Civ. L.R. 11-5(b). The Court further ordered that, “[i]f Kirsch does not file a
15 written response to this order on or before October 1, 2012, this case will be dismissed for
16 failure to prosecute.” Aug. 27, 2012 Order at 1. In accordance with the Court’s order,
17 Mr. Friedman filed a timely proof of service of the August 27, 2012 order on Ms. Kirsch.
18
To date, no response from Ms. Kirsch has been received by this Court. Accordingly,
19 with good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed with
20 prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Clerk shall close the file.
21
Pursuant to the condition imposed on Mr. Friedman’s withdrawal, he shall promptly
22 serve a copy of this order on Ms. Kirsch and file a proof of service with this Court on or
23 before October 19, 2012.
24
25 IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27 Dated: 10/16/12
28
THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?