Lagarde v. Support.com Inc.

Filing 49

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Parties' Stipulation to Vacate or Continue Case Management Conference filed by James Lagarde, Tim Batchelor. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on October 25, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2012)

Download PDF
1 4 SEAN P. REIS (SBN 184044) sreis@edelson.com EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300 Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 Tel: 949.459.2124 Fax: 949.459.2123 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 MICHAEL H. PAGE (SBN 154913) DURIE TANGRI LLP mpage@durietangri.com 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, California 94111 Tel: 415.362.6666 Fax: 415.236.6300 2 3 7 8 9 10 Attorneys for Defendants 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 17 JAMES LAGARDE and TIM BATCHELOR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 18 19 20 21 Case No. 3:12-cv-00609-JSC [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. SUPPORT.COM, INC. d/b/a SAMMSOFT, a Delaware corporation, AOL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Judge: Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley Action Filed: February 7, 2012 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00609-JSC 1 This matter coming before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulation to Vacate or Continue Case 2 Management Conference, due and adequate notice having been given, and the Court being duly 3 advised in the premises, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUGED: 5 1. 6 7 The case management conference in this matter currently set for November 1, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. is hereby vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 DATED: October 25, 2012 10 HONORABLE JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00609-JSC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?