Lagarde v. Support.com Inc.

Filing 54

ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION AND RESCHEDULING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 3/5/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 JAMES LAGARDE, et al., Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 Plaintiffs, v. 14 15 16 Case No.: 12-0609 JSC ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION AND RESCHEDULING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS SUPPORT.COM, INC., et al., Defendants. 17 18 Now pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ motion for final approval of class action 19 settlement, (Dkt. No. 53), and Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for attorneys’ fees and collective 20 incentive award, (Dkt. No. 51). A hearing on the motions is currently scheduled for March 7, 2013 21 at 9:00 a.m. At the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement, 22 the Court instructed Plaintiffs that they were to submit, in advance of the hearing on their motion for 23 final approval and motion for attorneys’ fees, documentation reflecting the current claim rate and 24 supporting their lodestar figure. 25 Given that Plaintiffs have yet to file such documentation, the Court hereby orders that by 26 March 13, 2013 Plaintiffs shall provide the Court with 1) the current rate of claims, and 2) detailed 27 billing records supporting their request for fees, including a description of each task and the duration 28 1 of each task. In addition, the Court hereby reschedules the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motions to March 2 21, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: March 5, 2013 _________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?