Sparacino v. ABC Legal Services, Inc.

Filing 37

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 35 to Dismiss Case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) filed by ABC Legal Services, Inc., Joyce Sparacino. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/10/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Fred W. Schwinn (SBN 225575)
CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INC.
12 South First Street, Suite 1014
San Jose, California 95113-2418
Telephone Number: [phone]
Facsimile Number: [phone]
Email Address: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff
JOYCE SPARACINO

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9
10
11

JOYCE SPARACINO,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

Case No. 3:12-CV-00624-EMC

v.
ABC LEGAL SERVICES, INC., a Washington
corporation; MICHELLE J. PEMBLETON,
individually and in her official capacity; and
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

16

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)

Defendants.

17
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), Plaintiff, JOYCE SPARACINO, and Defendant, ABC

18
19

LEGAL SERVICES, INC., stipulate, and the Court hereby orders, as follows:

20
21
22

1.

The dispute between the parties has been settled, therefore, the claims asserted by

Plaintiff, JOYCE SPARACINO, against Defendants, ABC LEGAL SERVICES, INC., and
MICHELLE J. PEMBLETON, in the above-captioned proceeding are hereby dismissed, with prejudice,

23
24

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1).

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
-1STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 3:12-CV-00624-EMC

1

Dated: December 20, 2012

/s/ Fred W. Schwinn
Fred W. Schwinn, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
JOYCE SPARACINO

Dated: December 20, 2012

/s/ William S. Weisberg
William S. Weisberg, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
ABC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
THE FOREGOING STIPULATION
IS APPROVED AND IS SO ORDERED.

10

S

The Honorable Edward M. Chen
Judge of the DistrictRDERED
Court

O
IT IS S

O

14

ER

LI

J

A

H

17

RT

16

. Chen

ward M
udge Ed

NO

15

R NIA

13

1/10/13

UNIT
ED

12

Dated:

RT
U
O

11

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

FO

9

N

18

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 3:12-CV-00624-EMC