Ramirez v. Trans Union, LLC

Filing 10

ORDER granting 9 STIPULATION To Further Extend Time For Defendant TransUnion LLC To Respond To Initial Complaint filed by Trans Union, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 3/30/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP JULIA B. STRICKLAND (State Bar No. 83013) STEPHEN J. NEWMAN (State Bar No. 181570) BRIAN C. FRONTINO (State Bar No. 222032) JEFFREY B. BELL (State Bar No. 269648) 2029 Century Park East Los Angeles, CA 90067-3086 Telephone: 310-556-5800 Facsimile: 310-556-5959 Email: lacalendar@stroock.com 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant TRANSUNION LLC 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 SERGIO L. RAMIREZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION, LLC, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:12-cv-00632-JSC STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TRANSUNION LLC TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA 51527509 STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TRANSUNION LLC TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT Case No. 3:12-cv-00632-JSC 1 WHEREAS, on February 9, 2012, plaintiff Sergio Ramirez (“Plaintiff”) filed the class 2 action complaint in this action (the “Complaint”) against TransUnion LLC (“TransUnion”), which 3 Complaint was served on TransUnion on February 16, 2012; 4 5 WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a), TransUnion’s initial time to respond to the Complaint was March 8, 2012; 6 WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), parties may stipulate in writing, without court 7 order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint, provided 8 the change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order; 2029 Century Park East Los Angeles, California 90067-3086 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 9 10 11 WHEREAS, the parties previously agreed to extend the deadline for TransUnion to respond to the Complaint to and including March 29, 2012; WHEREAS, due to the absence of key TransUnion personnel, TransUnion has requested, 12 and Plaintiff has agreed, to further extend the deadline for TransUnion to answer or otherwise 13 respond to the Complaint to and including April 6, 2012; and 14 15 16 WHEREAS, the further extension proposed herein will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel 17 of record, that TransUnion’s time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to 18 and including April 6, 2012. 19 Dated: March 29, 2012 20 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP JULIA B. STRICKLAND STEPHEN J. NEWMAN BRIAN C. FRONTINO 21 22 23 By: /s/ Jeffrey B. Bell Jeffrey B. Bell 24 Attorneys for Defendant TRANSUNION LLC 25 26 27 28 LA 51527509 -1STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TRANSUNION LLC TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT Case No. 3:12-cv-00632-JSC 1 Dated: March 29, 2012 2 ANDERSON, OGILVIE & BREWER, LLP ANDREW J. OGILVIE CAROL MCLEAN BREWER 3 4 By: /s/ Andrew J. Ogilvie Andrew J. Ogilvie 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff SERGIO L. RAMIREZ 6 7 8 2029 Century Park East Los Angeles, California 90067-3086 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA 51527509 -2STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TRANSUNION LLC TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT Case No. 3:12-cv-00632-JSC DECLARATION OF JEFFREY B. BELL 1 2 I, Jeffrey B. Bell, hereby declare as follows: 3 1. I am admitted to practice before this Court and am an associate at Stroock & 4 Stroock & Lavan LLP (“Stroock”), counsel for defendant TransUnion LLC (“TransUnion”) in this 5 action. I submit this Declaration in support of the Stipulation to Further Extend Time for 6 TransUnion to Respond to Initial Complaint (the “Stipulation”), in accordance with Section X.B. of 7 General Order 45 of this Court. The facts set forth herein are true of my own personal knowledge. 8 If called as a witness, I could and would competently testify thereto. 2. On March 29, 2012, Andrew J. Ogilvie, counsel for plaintiff Sergio L. Ramirez, sent 10 me an e-mail approving the content of the Stipulation, which I drafted and sent to him for his 11 review and approval on March 28, 2012, and authorizing me to execute it on his behalf. 12 13 I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 29th day of March, 2012. 14 /s/ Jeffrey B. Bell Jeffrey B. Bell Dated: 3/30/2012 S DISTRICT TE C TA 19 20 NO 21 TED GRAN RT ER 23 cquelin e Scott Corley A H 22 Judge Ja RT U O S 18 R NIA 17 FO 16 LI 15 UNIT ED 2029 Century Park East Los Angeles, California 90067-3086 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 9 N F D IS T IC T O R C 24 25 26 27 28 LA 51527509 -3STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TRANSUNION LLC TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT Case No. 3:12-cv-00632-JSC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?