Lounibos v. Keypoint Government Solutions Inc

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 28 CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION filed by Donald Lounibos, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 28 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTION F OR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION. Case Management Statement due by 2/21/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/28/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 2/28/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/9/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 STEVEN L. HAMMOND (SBN 220521) Hammond Law Group, P.C. One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2360 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 955-1915 DAVID HARRIS (SBN 215224) North Bay Law Group 116 E Blithedale Avenue, Suite 2 Mill Valley, CA 94941 Telephone: (415) 388-8788 FRANCIS SHEHADEH (SBN 251130) Law Office of Francis J. Shehadeh 819 Eddy Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Telephone: (415) 771-6174 Attorneys for Plaintiff DONALD LOUNIBOS MICHELLE B. HEVERLY (SBN 178660) KARIN M. COGBILL (SBN 244606) LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor San Jose, CA 95113.2303 Telephone: (408) 998.4150 Attorneys for Defendant KEYPOINT GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 DONALD LOUNIBOS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 20 21 22 23 24 Case No. 12-CV-0636 (EMC) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Plaintiff, v. KEYPOINT GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and Does 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 1 STIPULATION 2 3 Plaintiff Donald Lounibos (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Keypoint Government Solutions, Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively “the Parties”), stipulate and agree as follows: 4 WHEREAS, on November 2, 2012, the Parties engaged in a full day mediation session with the 5 Hon. David Garcia (Ret.) (“Judge Garcia”) at JAMS in San Francisco, California, at which time the 6 Parties were not able to settle the case but agreed to continue settlement discussions. Thereafter, the 7 Parties continued settlement discussions through Judge Garcia and on November 14, 2012, the Parties 8 reached a settlement in principle based on the terms discussed at the mediation and based on further 9 discussions and proposals made by the Parties and by Judge Garcia and have resolved this matter on a 10 class-wide basis; 11 WHEREAS, on November 19, 2012, the Parties filed a Notice of Settlement and Joint 12 Stipulation and Proposed Order to Vacate Case Management Conference and Set Deadline for Filing 13 Motion For Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. This Stipulation and Proposed Ordered 14 was entered by the Court on November 20, 2012. In particular, the Court’s Order reset the Case 15 Management Conference and the hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Approval for February 14, 2013, 16 and set Plaintiff’s deadline to file its Motion for Preliminary Approval for on or before January 10, 2013; 17 WHEREAS, the Parties have been working on the terms of the settlement agreement, notice 18 and claim forms but require additional time to work through several issues and to file the Motion for 19 Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 1 2 3 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties herein, through their counsel of record, as follows: The deadline for Plaintiff to file the Motion for Preliminary Approval shall be continued from 4 January 10, 2013, to January 24, 2013. The Case Management Conference and the hearing on the 5 Motion for Preliminary Approval shall be continued from February 14, 2013, to February 28, 2013, or as 6 soon thereafter as is convenient for the Court. 7 8 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: January 7, 2013 NORTH BAY LAW GROUP 10 ___________/s/___________________ David S. Harris Attorney For Plaintiff DONALD LOUNIBOS 11 12 13 14 DATED: January 7, 2013 15 LITTLER MENDELSON ____________/s/__________________ Karin Cogbill Attorneys for Defendant KEYPOINT GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS 16 17 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER 19 22 23 24 25 IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Plaintiff’s deadline to file the Motion for Preliminary Approval shall be continued from January 10, 2013 to January 24, 2013. The Case Management Conference and the hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Approval shall be continued from February 14, 2013, to February 28, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5. __________________________________ Honorable Edward M. Chen ED United States SO ORDER Judge District Court UNIT ED 28 9 DATED: January __, 2013 RT U O 27 S 26 S DISTRICT TE C TA 3 IT IS Chen R NIA 21 The parties having so stipulated, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT NO M. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONTINUING DEADLINEdwarFILING MOTION FOR E FOR d JACTION PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS udge SETTLEMENT R FO 20

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?