Lounibos v. Keypoint Government Solutions Inc
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 28 CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION filed by Donald Lounibos, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 28 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTION F OR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION. Case Management Statement due by 2/21/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/28/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 2/28/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/9/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
STEVEN L. HAMMOND (SBN 220521)
Hammond Law Group, P.C.
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2360
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 955-1915
DAVID HARRIS (SBN 215224)
North Bay Law Group
116 E Blithedale Avenue, Suite 2
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Telephone: (415) 388-8788
FRANCIS SHEHADEH (SBN 251130)
Law Office of Francis J. Shehadeh
819 Eddy Street
San Francisco, CA 94109
Telephone: (415) 771-6174
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DONALD LOUNIBOS
MICHELLE B. HEVERLY (SBN 178660)
KARIN M. COGBILL (SBN 244606)
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
Telephone: (408) 998.4150
Attorneys for Defendant
KEYPOINT GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, INC.
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
DONALD LOUNIBOS, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
20
21
22
23
24
Case No. 12-CV-0636 (EMC)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR
FILING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT
Plaintiff,
v.
KEYPOINT GOVERNMENT
SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware
Corporation, and Does 1-10, inclusive,
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
STIPULATION
2
3
Plaintiff Donald Lounibos (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Keypoint Government Solutions, Inc.
(“Defendant”) (collectively “the Parties”), stipulate and agree as follows:
4
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2012, the Parties engaged in a full day mediation session with the
5
Hon. David Garcia (Ret.) (“Judge Garcia”) at JAMS in San Francisco, California, at which time the
6
Parties were not able to settle the case but agreed to continue settlement discussions. Thereafter, the
7
Parties continued settlement discussions through Judge Garcia and on November 14, 2012, the Parties
8
reached a settlement in principle based on the terms discussed at the mediation and based on further
9
discussions and proposals made by the Parties and by Judge Garcia and have resolved this matter on a
10
class-wide basis;
11
WHEREAS, on November 19, 2012, the Parties filed a Notice of Settlement and Joint
12
Stipulation and Proposed Order to Vacate Case Management Conference and Set Deadline for Filing
13
Motion For Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. This Stipulation and Proposed Ordered
14
was entered by the Court on November 20, 2012. In particular, the Court’s Order reset the Case
15
Management Conference and the hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Approval for February 14, 2013,
16
and set Plaintiff’s deadline to file its Motion for Preliminary Approval for on or before January 10, 2013;
17
WHEREAS, the Parties have been working on the terms of the settlement agreement, notice
18
and claim forms but require additional time to work through several issues and to file the Motion for
19
Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement.
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
2
3
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties herein, through their counsel of record, as
follows:
The deadline for Plaintiff to file the Motion for Preliminary Approval shall be continued from
4
January 10, 2013, to January 24, 2013. The Case Management Conference and the hearing on the
5
Motion for Preliminary Approval shall be continued from February 14, 2013, to February 28, 2013, or as
6
soon thereafter as is convenient for the Court.
7
8
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: January 7, 2013
NORTH BAY LAW GROUP
10
___________/s/___________________
David S. Harris
Attorney For Plaintiff
DONALD LOUNIBOS
11
12
13
14
DATED: January 7, 2013
15
LITTLER MENDELSON
____________/s/__________________
Karin Cogbill
Attorneys for Defendant
KEYPOINT GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS
16
17
18
[PROPOSED] ORDER
19
22
23
24
25
IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s deadline to file the Motion for Preliminary Approval shall be continued from January
10, 2013 to January 24, 2013.
The Case Management Conference and the hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Approval shall
be continued from February 14, 2013, to February 28, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5.
__________________________________
Honorable Edward M. Chen
ED
United States SO ORDER Judge
District Court
UNIT
ED
28
9
DATED: January __, 2013
RT
U
O
27
S
26
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
3
IT IS
Chen
R NIA
21
The parties having so stipulated, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT
NO
M.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONTINUING DEADLINEdwarFILING MOTION FOR
E FOR d
JACTION
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS udge SETTLEMENT
R
FO
20
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?