Innovus Prime, LLC v. Vizio Inc

Filing 29

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 26, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 JOSEPH E. THOMAS (Cal. Bar No. 101443) jthomas@twtlaw.com 2 WILLIAM J. KOLEGRAFF (Cal. Bar No. 183861) wkolegraff@twtlaw.com 3 THOMAS WHITELAW LLP 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 230 4 Irvine, California 92612-7132 Telephone: (949) 679-6400 (949) 679-6405 5 Facsimile: 6 W. PAUL SCHUCK (Cal. Bar No. 203717) pschuck@twtlaw.com 7 THOMAS WHITELAW LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1350 8 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 820-0400 (415) 820-0405 9 Facsimile: 10 Attorneys for Defendant VIZIO, INC. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 INNOVUS PRIME LLC, Plaintiff, 17 CASE NO. CV 12-0658 WHA PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION vs. 18 Judge: The Honorable William Alsup 19 VIZIO, INC., Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 142664 CV 12-0658 WHA PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION Pursuant to the Case Management Order, Reference to Magistrate Judge for 1 2 Settlement/Mediation, and Further Reference to Magistrate Judge for Discovery Supervision (Dkt. 3 25, ¶ 3) (“CMO”), the parties hereby jointly submit this Proposed Order Re Schedule for Claim 4 Construction. In the CMO, the Court set the claim-construction hearing for December 19, 2012 and a 5 6 tutorial for December 5, 2012. As those dates relate to other dates for disclosures under the Patent 7 Local Run, the parties hereby submit the following jointly agreed upon proposed schedule for the 8 Patent Local Rule disclosures as well as for claim construction briefing under Patent Local Rule 4. 9 Event Date 10 Plaintiff's Preliminary Infringement Contentions and accompanying document 11 production (Pat. L.R. 3-1 & 3-2) July 10, 2012 12 Defendant's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions and accompanying document production (Pat. 13 L.R. 3-3 & 3-4) August 24, 2012 14 Exchange of Proposed Terms and Elements for Construction (Pat. L.R. 4-1) 15 Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions 16 & Extrinsic Evidence (Pat. L.R. 4-2) September 7, 2012 17 Joint Claim Construction Statement (Pat. L.R. 4-3) 18 Claim Construction Discovery Cut-off (Pat. 19 L.R. 4-4) September 25, 2012 20 Opening Claim Construction Brief (Pat. L.R. 45(a)) 21 Opposition Brief (Pat L.R. 4-5(b)) 22 Reply Brief (Pat. L.R. 4-5(c)) 23 Tutorial 24 Claim Construction Hearing 25 November 1, 2012 September 14, 2012 October 22, 2012 November 15, 2012 November 28, 2012 December 5, 2012, 1:30 p.m. December 19, 2012, 1:30 p.m. 26 27 28 142664 1 PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CV 12-0658 WHA 1 Dated: June 22, 2012 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN W. CARPENTER LLC 2 By: /s/ John W. Carpenter______________________ JOHN W. CARPENTER 3 Attorneys for Plaintiff INNOVUS PRIME LLC 4 5 6 Dated: June 22, 2012 THOMAS WHITELAW LLP 7 8 By: /s/ W. Paul Schuck JOSEPH E. THOMAS WILLIAM J. KOLEGRAFF W. PAUL SCHUCK Attorneys for Defendant VIZIO, INC. 9 10 11 12 Attestation re: Electronic Signature 13 I, W. Paul Schuck, the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 14 document, hereby attest, pursuant to General Order 45 § X.B., that each person whose signature 15 block appears above has concurred in this filing. 16 17 Dated: June 22, 2012 ___/s/ W. Paul Schuck_________________ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 142664 2 PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CV 12-0658 WHA 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER The Proposed Order Re Schedule for Claim Construction is hereby adopted by the Court 2 3 and the parties are ordered to comply with this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 June 26 6 Dated: __________________, 2012 ______________________________ The Honorable William Alsup United States District Court Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 142664 3 PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CV 12-0658 WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?