Innovus Prime, LLC v. Vizio Inc
Filing
29
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 26, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2012)
1 JOSEPH E. THOMAS (Cal. Bar No. 101443)
jthomas@twtlaw.com
2 WILLIAM J. KOLEGRAFF (Cal. Bar No. 183861)
wkolegraff@twtlaw.com
3 THOMAS WHITELAW LLP
18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 230
4 Irvine, California 92612-7132
Telephone:
(949) 679-6400
(949) 679-6405
5 Facsimile:
6 W. PAUL SCHUCK (Cal. Bar No. 203717)
pschuck@twtlaw.com
7 THOMAS WHITELAW LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1350
8 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 820-0400
(415) 820-0405
9 Facsimile:
10 Attorneys for Defendant VIZIO, INC.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16 INNOVUS PRIME LLC,
Plaintiff,
17
CASE NO. CV 12-0658 WHA
PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE
FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
vs.
18
Judge: The Honorable William Alsup
19 VIZIO, INC.,
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
142664
CV 12-0658 WHA
PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
Pursuant to the Case Management Order, Reference to Magistrate Judge for
1
2 Settlement/Mediation, and Further Reference to Magistrate Judge for Discovery Supervision (Dkt.
3 25, ¶ 3) (“CMO”), the parties hereby jointly submit this Proposed Order Re Schedule for Claim
4 Construction.
In the CMO, the Court set the claim-construction hearing for December 19, 2012 and a
5
6 tutorial for December 5, 2012. As those dates relate to other dates for disclosures under the Patent
7 Local Run, the parties hereby submit the following jointly agreed upon proposed schedule for the
8 Patent Local Rule disclosures as well as for claim construction briefing under Patent Local Rule 4.
9 Event
Date
10 Plaintiff's Preliminary Infringement
Contentions and accompanying document
11 production (Pat. L.R. 3-1 & 3-2)
July 10, 2012
12 Defendant's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions
and accompanying document production (Pat.
13 L.R. 3-3 & 3-4)
August 24, 2012
14 Exchange of Proposed Terms and Elements for
Construction (Pat. L.R. 4-1)
15
Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions
16 & Extrinsic Evidence (Pat. L.R. 4-2)
September 7, 2012
17 Joint Claim Construction Statement (Pat. L.R.
4-3)
18
Claim Construction Discovery Cut-off (Pat.
19 L.R. 4-4)
September 25, 2012
20 Opening Claim Construction Brief (Pat. L.R. 45(a))
21
Opposition Brief (Pat L.R. 4-5(b))
22
Reply Brief (Pat. L.R. 4-5(c))
23
Tutorial
24
Claim Construction Hearing
25
November 1, 2012
September 14, 2012
October 22, 2012
November 15, 2012
November 28, 2012
December 5, 2012, 1:30 p.m.
December 19, 2012, 1:30 p.m.
26
27
28
142664
1
PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
CV 12-0658 WHA
1 Dated: June 22, 2012
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN W. CARPENTER LLC
2
By: /s/ John W. Carpenter______________________
JOHN W. CARPENTER
3
Attorneys for Plaintiff INNOVUS PRIME LLC
4
5
6 Dated: June 22, 2012
THOMAS WHITELAW LLP
7
8
By: /s/ W. Paul Schuck
JOSEPH E. THOMAS
WILLIAM J. KOLEGRAFF
W. PAUL SCHUCK
Attorneys for Defendant VIZIO, INC.
9
10
11
12
Attestation re: Electronic Signature
13
I, W. Paul Schuck, the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this
14 document, hereby attest, pursuant to General Order 45 § X.B., that each person whose signature
15 block appears above has concurred in this filing.
16
17 Dated: June 22, 2012
___/s/ W. Paul Schuck_________________
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
142664
2
PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
CV 12-0658 WHA
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Proposed Order Re Schedule for Claim Construction is hereby adopted by the Court
2
3 and the parties are ordered to comply with this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
June 26
6 Dated: __________________, 2012
______________________________
The Honorable William Alsup
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
142664
3
PROPOSED ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
CV 12-0658 WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?