Innovus Prime, LLC v. Vizio Inc

Filing 6

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT VIZIO TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 3/7/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2012)

1 JOSEPH E. THOMAS (Cal. Bar No. 101443)
[e-mail]
2 WILLIAM J. KOLEGRAFF (Cal. Bar No. 183861)
[e-mail]
3 THOMAS WHITELAW & KATZ LLP
18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 230
4 Irvine, California 92612-7132
Telephone:
[phone]
[phone]
5 Facsimile:
6 W. PAUL SCHUCK (Cal. Bar No. 203717)
[e-mail]
7 THOMAS WHITELAW & KATZ LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1350
8 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
[phone]
9 Facsimile:
10 Attorneys for Defendant VIZIO, INC.
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
INNOVUS PRIME LLC,

CASE NO. CV 12-0658 JCS

16
Plaintiff,
17
vs.
18

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT VIZIO, INC. TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
INFRINGEMENT

VIZIO, INC.
Date of filing: February 9, 2012

19
Defendant.

Judge: The Honorable Joseph C. Spero

20
21

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Innovus Prime LLC and Defendant VIZIO,
22
Inc. (“VIZIO”) agree to extend VIZIO’s time to respond or otherwise plead to Plaintiff’s
23
Complaint for Patent Infringement (Docket No. 1) filed in this Court up to and including April 19,
24
2012.
25
This change in time will not alter the date of any event or any deadline currently fixed by
26
Court order.
27
28
134921

Case No. CV 12-658 JCS
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT VIZIO TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Pursuant to General Order 45 section X(B), counsel for VIZIO hereby attests that

1

2 concurrence in the filing of this stipulation has been obtained from the other signatory of this
3 document.
4
5 DATED: March 6, 2012

THOMAS WHITELAW & KATZ LLP

6
By: /s/ W. Paul Schuck
W. PAUL SCHUCK
JOSEPH E. THOMAS
WILLIAM J. KOLEGRAFF

7
8
9

Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1350
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

10
11
12

Attorneys for Defendant VIZIO, INC.

13
14
DATED: March 6, 2012

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN W. CARPENTER LLC

15
16

By: /s/ John W Carpenter
JOHN W. CARPENTER

17
18

20

12 Metairie Court
Metairie, LA 70001-3032
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

21

Attorneys for Plaintiff INNOVUS PRIME LLC

19

25
RT

ER

A

H

27

Spero

LI

seph C.
Judge Jo

NO

26

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

R NIA

S

Dated: March 7, 2012

UNIT
ED

24

RT
U
O

23

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

FO

22

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

28
134921

CV 12-658 JCS
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT VIZIO TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT