Flores et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
Filing
35
ORDER GRANTING 34 MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 7/6/2012. Case Management Conference set for 7/13/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 5/23/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2012)
Case3:12-cv-00686-JSW Document34 Filed05/22/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
Joel R. Bryant, Esq. (State Bar No. 149370)
jbryant@gbflawyers.com
GREEN BRYANT & FRENCH LLP
1230 Columbia Street, Suite 1120
San Diego, California 92101
Tel: (619) 239-7900
Fax: (619) 239-7800
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Julio Flores, Adriana Flores,
Daniela Flores, and Liana Flores
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
)
CASE NO: 3:12-cv-00686-JSW
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
)
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
v.
)
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
)
NATIONAL RAILROAD
)
Date: June 1, 2012
PASSENGER CORPORATION, dba
)
Time: 1:30 p.m.
AMTRAK, et al.
)
Dept.: Courtroom 11, Floor 19
)
Judge: Honorable Jeffrey S. White
Defendant(s)
)
)
JULIO FLORES et al.
16
17
Pursuant to the Court’s April 3, 2012 Order, a Case Management Conference in the above
18
referenced matter was scheduled for June 1, 2012. The Order further required the parties to file a
19
Joint Case Management Conference Statement no later than May 31, 2012. For the reasons set forth
20
below, Parties hereby stipulate to request that the Court continue the Case Management Conference
21
scheduled for June 1, 2012 to July 13, 2012, at 1:30 p.m..
22
Lead counsel for plaintiffs is scheduled to appear at a Case Management Conference in the
23
Southern District of California in another matter on June 1, 2012. Initially it appeared that counsel
24
would be able to attend both the Southern District Conference and the Conference in the matter
25
before this Court. Plaintiffs' counsel has since been informed that the Southern Case Management
26
Conference is expected to be lengthy, and as such, would not allow him enough time to attend both
27
Conferences.
28
Parties agree that as a matter of efficiency, it would be most beneficial to have all parties
-1Case No: 3:12-cv-00686-JSW
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case3:12-cv-00686-JSW Document34 Filed05/22/12 Page2 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
present at the Case Management Conference
NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the Court’s approval, Parties, by and through their counsel
of record, hereby stipulate to request:
1.
That the Case Management Conference be continued from June 1, 2012, at 1:30 p.m.,
to July 13, 2012, at 1:30 a.m.; and
2.
That the corresponding deadline to file the Joint Case Management Conference
Statement be continued to July 6, 2012.
8
9
10
GREEN BRYANT & FRENCH, LLP
Dated: May 22, 2012
11
12
/s/ Joel R. Bryant
Joel R. Bryant, Esq.
Jbryant@gbflawyers.com
Attorney for Plaintiffs
13
CHARLES J. McKEE, COUNTY COUNSEL
14
15
Dated: May 22, 2012
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
/s/ William Litt
WILLIAM LITT
Deputy County Counsel
Attorneys for Defendant
COUNTY OF MONTEREY
CHARLES J. McKEE, COUNTY COUNSEL
Dated: May 22, 2012
/s/ Vincent Castillo
VINCENT CASTILLO
vcastillo@llcllp.com
Attorney for Defendants
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Union Pacific Railroad Company
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2Case No: 3:12-cv-00686-JSW
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case3:12-cv-00686-JSW Document34 Filed05/22/12 Page3 of 3
1
ORDER
2
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
3
1.
4
5
6
The Case Management Conference is continued from June 1, 2012, at 1:30 p.m.,
July 13, 2012
to ___________________;
2.
The deadline to file the Joint Case Management Conference Statement is continued
July 6, 2012
from June 31, 2012, to _______________________.
7
8
9
10
May 23, 2012
Dated: __________________
______________________________
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3Case No: 3:12-cv-00686-JSW
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?