Flores et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al

Filing 52

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER re 51 Letter filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company, National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/9/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2013)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

Northern District of California

5
6

JULIO FLORES, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

7

No. C-12-686 MEJ

v.
8
9
10

NATIONAL RAILROARD PASSENGER
CORP. dba AMTRAK, et al.,

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT
REQUESTS

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11
The Court is in receipt of the parties’ request for a case management conference. Upon

13

review of the parties’ request, the Court finds a conference unnecessary and ORDERS as follows:

14

1)

15
16

To the extent that the parties all seek to extend case management deadlines (including
deposing experts), they shall file a stipulation and proposed order;

2)

To the extent that the parties are unable to reach an agreement regarding any deadlines

17

(including rebuttal expert reports), they shall comply with the undersigned’s discovery

18

standing order;

19

3)

To the extent that the parties object to the content of expert reports, such objections are

20

properly addressed through rebuttal expert reports, objections filed as part of or in opposition

21

to a summary judgment motion, or in motions in limine; and

22

4)

Any party submitting the train’s locomotive video (or any other video) shall manually file it

23

in compliance with Civil Local 5-1(f).

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: May 9, 2013
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge