Vartanian v. Nationwide Legal, Inc et al

Filing 55

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 54 to Extend Deadlines for mediation filed by Greg Vartanian, Nationwide Legal, LLC, Nationwide Legal, Inc Case Management Statement due by 7/5/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 7/11/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Class Certification Motion Hearing set for 10/31/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/29/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 FERNANDO F. CHAVEZ ffchavez1530@gmail.com California Bar No. 86902 LAW OFFICES OF FERNANDO F. CHAVEZ 1530 The Alameda, Suite 301 San Jose, CA 95126 (408) 971-3903 – Phone (408) 971-0117 – Facsimile Attorneys for Greg Vartanian, Plaintiff 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION GREG VARTANIAN, on behalf § of himself and all others similarly situated, § § § Plaintiffs, § Case No. 3:12-cv-00691-EMC vs. § § JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED NATIONWIDE LEGAL, INC., ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES § NATIONWIDE LEGAL, LLC, and § DOES 1-100, inclusive. § § Defendant. 18 Plaintiff, Greg Vartanian, individually, and on behalf of putative class members 19 20 (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants, Nationwide Legal, Inc. and Nationwide Legal, LLC 21 (“Defendants”), through their undersigned attorneys, stipulate and respectfully request that this 22 Court approve an extension of time for completion of mediation from April 29, 2013 to June 28, 23 2013; (b) continue the status conference from May 9, 2013 to July 11, 2013; (c) continue the 24 deadline for Plaintiff to serve his FLSA 216(b) and Rule 23 Class Certification motion from July 25 26 16, 2013 to September 13, 2013; and (d) continue the hearing on class certification to from 27 August 22, 2013 to October 31, 2013. As grounds for this extension, the parties state as follows: 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES - 1 1 2 1. On February 21, 2013 the parties filed a Notice of Stipulation and Order re Continuance of Mediation Completion Date (Doc. 52) requesting that (a) the mediation deadline 3 be moved to April 29, 2013; (b) the status conference be continued to May 6, 2013; and (c) 4 5 continuing the deadline for Plaintiff to serve his FLSA and Rule 23 Motion for Class 6 Certification to July 16, 2013. 7 2. This Court entered an Order (Doc. 53) on February 25, 2013 (a) continuing the 8 mediation completion date to April 29, 2013; (b) continuing the status conference to May 9, 9 10 2013 at 10:30 a.m.; (c) continuing the deadline for Plaintiff to serve his FLSA 216(b) and Rule 11 23 Class Certification Motion to July 16, 2013; and (d) continuing the hearing on class 12 certification to August 22, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. 13 3. The parties were scheduled to mediate this matter on April 24, 2013 with Carol 14 Woodward in San Francisco. 15 16 4. On Sunday, April 21, 2013 Robert Camp, lead counsel for the Plaintiff, had to 17 cancel the mediation due to his father-in-law’s terminal illness, which required he and his family 18 to assist in caring for his father-in-law. On April 25, 2013, hospice evaluated the undersigned’s 19 father-in-law and determined that he had a two to three week life expectancy. The undersigned 20 has been out of the office with his father-in-law since April 21, 2013 and does not expect to be 21 22 23 24 able to return until the middle of May. 5. The undersigned has been the key attorney involved in discussions with defense counsel, reviewing documents and calculating damages and, as such, is necessary to the 25 mediation process. 26 27 28 6. The undersigned conferred with the mediator and Defendant’s counsel on April 21, 2013 to apprise them of the situation and neither is opposed to the requested extension. JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES - 2 1 2 7. For the above reasons, the parties request that the Court (a) extend the deadline for completion of mediation from April 29, 2013 to June 28, 2013; (b) continue the status 3 conference from May 9, 2013 to July 11, 2013; (c) continue the deadline for Plaintiff to serve his 4 5 FLSA 216(b) and Rule 23 Class Certification motion from July 16, 2013 to September 13, 2013; 6 and (d) continue the hearing on class certification to October 31, 2013. 7 Dated: April 29, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 8 THE COCHRAN FIRM, LLC 9 /s/ Robert J. Camp ROBERT J. CAMP rcamp@cochranfirm.com Admitted Pro Hac Vice 1929 3rd Avenue North, Suite 800 Birmingham, AL 35203 (205) 244-1115 – Phone (205) 244-1171 – Facsimile 10 11 12 13 14 15 MITCHELL G. ALLEN mallen@cwcd.com CORY, WATSON, CROWDER AND DEGARIS 2131 Magnolia Avenue Birmingham, AL 35205 205-328-2800 – Phone 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23             FERNANDO CHAVEZ fchavez@chavez-deleon.com   California Bar No. 86902  LAW OFFICES OF FERNANDO F. CHAVEZ 1530 The Alameda, Suite 301 San Jose, CA 95126 (408) 971-3903 – Phone (408) 971-0117 – Facsimile 24 25 Attorneys for Plaintiff GREG VARTANIAN 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES - 3 – and – 2 /s/ Erin Smith MICHELLE LA MAR (SBN 163038) mlamar@loeb.com JON DARYANANI (SBN 205149) jdaryanani@loeb.com ERIN SMITH (SBN 235039) esmith@loeb.com LOEB & LOEB LLP 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Ste. 2200 Los Angeles, CA 90067 (310) 282.2000 – Phone (310) 282.2200 – Facsimile 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MICHAEL E. ADAMS equitist@earthlink.net LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL E. ADAMS 702 Marshall Street, suite 300 Redwood City, CA 94063 (650) 599-9463 – Phone (650) 599-9785 – Facsimile 11 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Defendants NATIONWIDE LEGAL, INC. and NATIONWIDE LEGAL, LLC 16 RT U O 21 25 ER H 24 RT 23 NO 22 D ________________ RDERE S SO O Edward M. Chen IT I U.S. District Judge n M. Che Edward Judge LI 20 A 19 UNIT ED S 18 S DISTRICT TE C IT IS SO ORDERED: A T R NIA 17 FO 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES - 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?