Vartanian v. Nationwide Legal, Inc et al
Filing
55
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 54 to Extend Deadlines for mediation filed by Greg Vartanian, Nationwide Legal, LLC, Nationwide Legal, Inc Case Management Statement due by 7/5/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 7/11/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Class Certification Motion Hearing set for 10/31/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/29/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
FERNANDO F. CHAVEZ
ffchavez1530@gmail.com
California Bar No. 86902
LAW OFFICES OF FERNANDO F. CHAVEZ
1530 The Alameda, Suite 301
San Jose, CA 95126
(408) 971-3903 – Phone
(408) 971-0117 – Facsimile
Attorneys for Greg Vartanian, Plaintiff
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
GREG VARTANIAN, on behalf
§
of himself and all others similarly situated, §
§
§
Plaintiffs,
§ Case No. 3:12-cv-00691-EMC
vs.
§
§ JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
NATIONWIDE LEGAL, INC.,
ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES
§
NATIONWIDE LEGAL, LLC, and
§
DOES 1-100, inclusive.
§
§
Defendant.
18
Plaintiff, Greg Vartanian, individually, and on behalf of putative class members
19
20
(“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants, Nationwide Legal, Inc. and Nationwide Legal, LLC
21
(“Defendants”), through their undersigned attorneys, stipulate and respectfully request that this
22
Court approve an extension of time for completion of mediation from April 29, 2013 to June 28,
23
2013; (b) continue the status conference from May 9, 2013 to July 11, 2013; (c) continue the
24
deadline for Plaintiff to serve his FLSA 216(b) and Rule 23 Class Certification motion from July
25
26
16, 2013 to September 13, 2013; and (d) continue the hearing on class certification to from
27
August 22, 2013 to October 31, 2013. As grounds for this extension, the parties state as follows:
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES - 1
1
2
1.
On February 21, 2013 the parties filed a Notice of Stipulation and Order re
Continuance of Mediation Completion Date (Doc. 52) requesting that (a) the mediation deadline
3
be moved to April 29, 2013; (b) the status conference be continued to May 6, 2013; and (c)
4
5
continuing the deadline for Plaintiff to serve his FLSA and Rule 23 Motion for Class
6
Certification to July 16, 2013.
7
2.
This Court entered an Order (Doc. 53) on February 25, 2013 (a) continuing the
8
mediation completion date to April 29, 2013; (b) continuing the status conference to May 9,
9
10
2013 at 10:30 a.m.; (c) continuing the deadline for Plaintiff to serve his FLSA 216(b) and Rule
11
23 Class Certification Motion to July 16, 2013; and (d) continuing the hearing on class
12
certification to August 22, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.
13
3.
The parties were scheduled to mediate this matter on April 24, 2013 with Carol
14
Woodward in San Francisco.
15
16
4.
On Sunday, April 21, 2013 Robert Camp, lead counsel for the Plaintiff, had to
17
cancel the mediation due to his father-in-law’s terminal illness, which required he and his family
18
to assist in caring for his father-in-law. On April 25, 2013, hospice evaluated the undersigned’s
19
father-in-law and determined that he had a two to three week life expectancy. The undersigned
20
has been out of the office with his father-in-law since April 21, 2013 and does not expect to be
21
22
23
24
able to return until the middle of May.
5.
The undersigned has been the key attorney involved in discussions with defense
counsel, reviewing documents and calculating damages and, as such, is necessary to the
25
mediation process.
26
27
28
6.
The undersigned conferred with the mediator and Defendant’s counsel on April
21, 2013 to apprise them of the situation and neither is opposed to the requested extension.
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES - 2
1
2
7.
For the above reasons, the parties request that the Court (a) extend the deadline
for completion of mediation from April 29, 2013 to June 28, 2013; (b) continue the status
3
conference from May 9, 2013 to July 11, 2013; (c) continue the deadline for Plaintiff to serve his
4
5
FLSA 216(b) and Rule 23 Class Certification motion from July 16, 2013 to September 13, 2013;
6
and (d) continue the hearing on class certification to October 31, 2013.
7
Dated: April 29, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
8
THE COCHRAN FIRM, LLC
9
/s/ Robert J. Camp
ROBERT J. CAMP
rcamp@cochranfirm.com
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
1929 3rd Avenue North, Suite 800
Birmingham, AL 35203
(205) 244-1115 – Phone
(205) 244-1171 – Facsimile
10
11
12
13
14
15
MITCHELL G. ALLEN
mallen@cwcd.com
CORY, WATSON, CROWDER AND DEGARIS
2131 Magnolia Avenue
Birmingham, AL 35205
205-328-2800 – Phone
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
FERNANDO CHAVEZ
fchavez@chavez-deleon.com
California Bar No. 86902
LAW OFFICES OF FERNANDO F. CHAVEZ
1530 The Alameda, Suite 301
San Jose, CA 95126
(408) 971-3903 – Phone
(408) 971-0117 – Facsimile
24
25
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GREG VARTANIAN
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES - 3
– and –
2
/s/ Erin Smith
MICHELLE LA MAR (SBN 163038)
mlamar@loeb.com
JON DARYANANI (SBN 205149)
jdaryanani@loeb.com
ERIN SMITH (SBN 235039)
esmith@loeb.com
LOEB & LOEB LLP
10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Ste. 2200
Los Angeles, CA 90067
(310) 282.2000 – Phone
(310) 282.2200 – Facsimile
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
MICHAEL E. ADAMS
equitist@earthlink.net
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL E. ADAMS
702 Marshall Street, suite 300
Redwood City, CA 94063
(650) 599-9463 – Phone
(650) 599-9785 – Facsimile
11
12
13
14
15
Attorneys for Defendants
NATIONWIDE LEGAL, INC. and
NATIONWIDE LEGAL, LLC
16
RT
U
O
21
25
ER
H
24
RT
23
NO
22
D
________________
RDERE
S SO O
Edward M. Chen IT I
U.S. District Judge
n
M. Che
Edward
Judge
LI
20
A
19
UNIT
ED
S
18
S DISTRICT
TE
C
IT IS SO ORDERED: A
T
R NIA
17
FO
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES - 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?