Atomic Precision Systems, Inc. v. Jusung Engineering Co., LTD. et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER Selecting ADR Process. Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 06/15/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2012)

Case3:12-cv-00697-JSW Document18 Filed06/14/12 Page1 of 3

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DIVISION OF CALIFORNIA

2
3
4

ATOMIC PRECISION SYSTEMS, INC.,

Case No. 3:12-CV-00697-JSW

Plaintiff,

5

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

6

v.

7

JUSUNG ENGINEERING CO., LTD. and
JUSUNG AMERICA, INC. ,

8

Defendants.

9
10
11

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-18 and ADR L.R. 3-5.
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Court Processes:

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R.4)

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R.5)

Mediation (ADR L.R.6)
Private Process:

The parties have agreed to private mediation from a provider to be
determined by mutual assent of the parties.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

The presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the
order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)


other requested deadline

21
22

Dated: June 14, 2012

/s/ Daniel W. Bedell _____
Daniel W. Bedell
Attorney for Plaintiff
ATOMIC PRECISION SYSTEMS, INC.

Dated: June 14, 2012

_/s/ Michael J. Lyons_____
Michael J. Lyons
Attorney for Defendants
JUSUNG ENGINEERING CO., LTD. and
JUSUNG AMERICA, INC.

23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Case No. 3:12-CV-00697-JSW

1

Case3:12-cv-00697-JSW Document18 Filed06/14/12 Page3 of 3

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:

Non-binding Arbitration

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)

Mediation

Private ADR

3
4
5

Deadline for ADR session

90 days from the date of this order.

Other

6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

Dated:

June 15, 2012

_____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Case No. 3:12-CV-00697-JSW

3