Atomic Precision Systems, Inc. v. Jusung Engineering Co., LTD. et al

Filing 43

ORDER GRANTING 42 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/8/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2013)

1 THE LANIER LAW FIRM, P.C.
CHRISTOPHER D. BANYS (SBN 230038)
2 [e-mail]
3 2200 Geng Road
Suite 200
4 Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
MICHAEL J. LYONS (SBN 202284)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL F. CARR (SBN 259911)
[e-mail]
2 Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

6
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
7 ATOMIC PRECISION SYSTEMS, INC.

Attorneys for Defendants
JUSUNG ENGINEERING CO., LTD. and
JUSUNG AMERICA, INC.

8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13

ATOMIC PRECISION SYSTEMS, INC.,
Plaintiff,

14
v.

Case No. 3:12-CV-00697-JSW
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

15
JUSUNG ENGINEERING CO., LTD., ET
16 AL.,
17

Defendants.

18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER; CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-00697-JSW

1

It is hereby stipulated between Plaintiff Atomic Precision Systems, Inc. (“Atomic

2 Precision”) and Defendants Jusung Engineering Co., Ltd. and Jusung America, Inc. (collectively
3 “Jusung”), by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
4 Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Atomic Precision’s claims against Jusung in above-captioned action
5 shall be dismissed with prejudice, and that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(c)(1),
6 Jusung’s counterclaims against Atomic Precision in above-captioned action shall be dismissed
7 without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney fees.

8
Dated: February 8, 2013

/s/ Christopher D. Banys
Christopher D. Banys
Counsel for Plaintiff
ATOMIC PRECISION SYSTEMS, INC.

Dated: February 8, 2013

9

/s/ Michael J. Lyons
Michael J. Lyons
Counsel for Defendants
JUSUNG ENGINEERING CO., LTD. and
JUSUNG AMERICA, INC.

10
11
12
13
14

15
16

PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45,

17

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Michael J. Lyons, attest that

18 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I
19 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing
20 is true and correct. Executed this 8th day of February, 2013, at Palo Alto.
21
/s/ Christopher D. Banys
Christopher D. Banys

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER; CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-00697-JSW

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
3

That the Stipulation of Dismissal and [Proposed] Order is adopted by the Court. The

4 claims of Atomic Precision against Jusung are dismissed with prejudice and the counterclaims of
5 Jusung are dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney fees.
6 The Clerk shall close the file.
7

8 Dated: ________________, 2013
February 8
HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER; CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-00697-JSW