Symantec Corporation v. Veeam Software Corporation

Filing 128

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL 126 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/14/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO SEAL

Plaintiff,

10
11

No. C 12-00700 SI

SYMANTEC CORPORATION,

v.

12

VEEAM SOFTWARE CORPORATION,

13

Defendant.

/

14
15

Currently before the Court is defendant’s administrative motion to seal Exhibit A to defendant’s

16

motion for leave to amend its invalidity contentions and seal Exhibit 11 to the Pickard Declaration in

17

support thereof. Docket No. 126. Veeam seeks to file the material under seal because it was designated

18

as highly confidential attorneys eyes only by Symantec. Symantec has clarified that the material at issue

19

was erroneously classified as confidential and that the information can be filed in the public docket.

20

Docket No. 127.

21
22
23

Therefore, Veeam’s motion to seal is DENIED as moot. Veeam shall e-file a public version of
Exhibit A and Exhibit 11 within five days of the date of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: June 14, 2013

SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE