Symantec Corporation v. Veeam Software Corporation

Filing 156

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting (155) Stipulation in case 3:12-cv-00700-SI to adjust briefing schedule (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2013)

QUINN, EMANUEL, URQUHART &
1 SULLIVAN, LLP
Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. 203679)
2 [e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 Kate Cassidy
[e-mail]
6 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10010
7 Telephone: [phone]
8 Attorneys for plaintiff Symantec Corporation
9 NIXON PEABODY LLP
Gregory P. O’Hara (State Bar No. 131963)
10 2 Palo Alto Square
11 3000 El Camino Real, Suite 500
Palo Alto, CA 94306
12 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 866.294.5752
13 Email: [e-mail]
14

STERNE KESSLER GOLDSTEIN & FOX
15 Mark Fox Evens (pro hac vice)
Bryon L. Pickard (pro hac vice)
16 1100 New York Avenue
Washington, DC 20005
17 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.371.2540
18
19 Attorneys for defendant Veeam Software Corporation
20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO

21
22

23 SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
24
25

Case No. 3:12-cv-00700-SI and related
Case No. 3:12-cv-05443-SI

Plaintiff,
vs.

26 VEEAM SOFTWARE CORPORATION,
27

Defendant.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
THE PARTIES STIPULATION TO
EXTEND DEADLINES RELATED TO
SYMANTEC’S RULE 42(a) MOTION
TO CONSOLIDATE

28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

2

Veeam’s Response to Symantec’s Motion shall be extended to August 30, 2013.

3 Symantec’s Reply to Veeam’s Response shall be extended to September 6, 2013.
4
5
6

8/26/13
DATED: _______________
Honorable Susan Illston

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE