Symantec Corporation v. Veeam Software Corporation

Filing 158

ORDER, Motions terminated: (75 in 3:12-cv-05443-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to consolidate the Veeam I (12-cv-700) with the Veeam II (12-cv-5443) cases filed by Symantec Corporation, (152 in 3:12-cv-00700-SI) MOTION to Con solidate Cases filed by Symantec Corporation, (157 in 3:12-cv-00700-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to consolidate the Veeam I (12-cv-700) and Veeam II (12-cv-5443) cases filed by Symantec Corporation.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 8/29/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2013)

1 Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. 203679)
[e-mail]
2 50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
3 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
4
Dave Nelson (pro hac vice)
5 [e-mail]
500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450
6 Chicago, IL 60661
Telephone: [phone]
7 Facsimile: [phone]
8 Kate Cassidy (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
9 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10010
10 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
11
Attorneys for plaintiff Symantec Corporation.
12
Mark Fox Evens (pro hac vice)
13 Byron L. Pickard (pro hac vice)
STERNE KESSLER GOLDSTEIN & FOX
14 1100 New York Avenue
15 Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
16 Facsimile: [phone]
17 Attorneys for defendant Veeam Software Corporation.
18
19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

21

SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
Case No. 3:12-cv-00700 SI

22

Plaintiff,

23
24

vs.
VEEAM SOFTWARE CORPORATION

25

Defendant.

26

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING
SYMANTEC CORPORATION V. VEEAM
SOFTWARE CORPORATION, CASE NO.
3:12-CV-00700 SI (“VEEAM I”) WITH
SYMANTEC CORPORATION V. VEEAM
SOFTWARE CORPORATION, CASE NO.
3:12-CV-05443 SI (“VEEAM II”)
ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING 12-5443 SI

27
28

Case No. 3:12-cv-00700 SI
VEEAM

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE VEEAM I AND VEEAM II

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

2

1.

Veeam I shall be consolidated with Veeam II;

3

2.

Symantec shall file stipulation papers dismissing U.S. Patent 7,254,682 with

4 prejudice from the consolidated case within five days of this order;
5

3.

All dates in the Veeam I case schedule are vacated (including the deadline for

6 expert discovery, summary judgment, and trial) and the consolidated case shall proceed on the
7 following schedule:
8

Activity

Due Date

Claim Construction Hearing for Veeam II

9/18/13 (Dkt 154)

Close of Fact Discovery for Veeam II

90 days after the claim construction ruling

Opening Expert Reports on Veeam II issues

60 days after the close of fact discovery

Rebuttal Expert Reports on Veeam II issues

120 days of the close of fact discovery

Close of Expert Discovery (i.e. depositions)
for Veeam I and Veeam II

165 days after the close of fact discovery

Summary Judgment Opening Briefs

30 days after the close of expert-witness
discovery

Summary Judgment Opposition Briefs

30 days after service of the opening brief

Summary Judgment Reply Briefs

15 days after the service of the opposition
brief.

17

Summary Judgment Hearing

At the Court’s convenience

18

Pretrial Conference

TBD

Trial

TBD

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

19

4.

Symantec’s expert Jim Kearl will submit the irreparable injury report in the Veeam

5.

Symantec’s expert Jeff Stec will submit the market research report in the Veeam II

6.

20

Symantec's expert Raymond Sims will submit the lost profits/reasonable royalty

21 II case.
22
23 case.
24

25 report in the Veeam II.
26
27
28

DATED: August 29 2013
__,

By:
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge

Due to the consolidation of these cases, C-12-5443 shall be administratively closed and all further filings shall be made in
C-12-0700 SI.

Case No. 3:12-cv-00700 SI
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE VEEAM I AND VEEAM II