Symantec Corporation v. Veeam Software Corporation

Filing 182

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting 181 Stipulation for both parties to amend their contentions (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2014)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
7
8 SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
Case No. 3:12-cv-00700 SI
9

Plaintiff,

10

vs.

11 VEEAM SOFTWARE CORPORATION
12

Defendant.

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
STIPULATION FOR SYMANTEC TO
SUPPLEMENT ITS INFRINGEMENT
CONTENTIONS AND FOR VEEAM TO
SUPPLEMENT ITS INVALIDITY
CONTENTIONS

13
14
15
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
16
(1)

Symantec shall serve amended infringement contentions to include Veeam’s

17
Backup & Replication v7.0 for U.S. Patent No. 7,093,086 and to expand Symantec’s doctrine of
18
equivalents contention for U.S. Patent No. 7,024,527 within 10 days of this order; and
19
(2)

Veeam shall serve supplemental invalidity contentions to assert Backup Exec 11d

20
against U.S. Patent No. 7,831,861 within 10 days of this order.
21
22

27
DATED: MARCH __, 2014

23

By:
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
28

VEEAM

Case No. 3:12-cv-00700 SI
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION
FOR THE PARTIES TO AMEND THEIR CONTENTIONS