Symantec Corporation v. Veeam Software Corporation
Filing
33
ORDER, Motions terminated: 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to extend Symantec's time to respond to Veeam's Motion to Dismiss filed by Symantec Corporation. Motion continued to 5/25/12 @ 9:00 a.m. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 4/30/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2012) Modified on 4/30/2012 (tfS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11 SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
12
13
Plaintiff,
vs.
14 VEEAM SOFTWARE CORPORATION
15
Defendant.
Case No. 3:12-cv-00700 SI (consolidated for all
purposed with Civil Action No. 12-01035-SI)
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
SYMANTEC’S REQUEST FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE
AMENDED COMPLAINT
16
17
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
18
1.
Symantec’s response to Veeam’s Motion to Dismiss will be due on May 4, 2012;
20
2.
Veeam’s reply will be due on May 11, 2012; and
21
3.
The motion will be heard on May 25, 2012.
19
22
23
24
25
DATED: April __, 2012
30
By:
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge
26
27
28
Case No. 3:12-cv-00700 SI
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SYMANTEC’S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?