Symantec Corporation v. Veeam Software Corporation

Filing 33

ORDER, Motions terminated: 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to extend Symantec's time to respond to Veeam's Motion to Dismiss filed by Symantec Corporation. Motion continued to 5/25/12 @ 9:00 a.m. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 4/30/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2012) Modified on 4/30/2012 (tfS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

11 SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
12
13

Plaintiff,
vs.

14 VEEAM SOFTWARE CORPORATION
15

Defendant.

Case No. 3:12-cv-00700 SI (consolidated for all
purposed with Civil Action No. 12-01035-SI)
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
SYMANTEC’S REQUEST FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE
AMENDED COMPLAINT

16
17
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
18
1.

Symantec’s response to Veeam’s Motion to Dismiss will be due on May 4, 2012;

20

2.

Veeam’s reply will be due on May 11, 2012; and

21

3.

The motion will be heard on May 25, 2012.

19

22
23
24
25

DATED: April __, 2012
30
By:
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge

26
27
28
Case No. 3:12-cv-00700 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SYMANTEC’S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT