Symantec Corporation v. Veeam Software Corporation

Filing 97

ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference previously set to occur in early February are continued to 2/22/2013 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 1/22/13., Motions terminated: (42 in 3:12-cv-05443-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Reschedule Initial Case Management Conference filed by Veeam Software Corporation. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

NIXON PEABODY LLP
Gregory P. O’Hara (State Bar No. 131963)
2 Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 500
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 866.294.5752
Email: [e-mail]
STERNE KESSLER GOLDSTEIN & FOX
Mark Fox Evens (pro hac vice)
Bryon L. Pickard (pro hac vice)
1100 New York Avenue
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.371.2540
Attorneys for Defendant Veeam Software Corporation
QUINN, EMANUEL, URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Jennifer A. Kash (State Bar No. 203679)
[e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

19

Dave Nelson (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Chris Lawnicki (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450
Chicago, IL 60661
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 312.705.7401

20

Attorneys for Plaintiff Symantec Corporation

16
17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

21
22
23

SYMANTEC CORPORATION,

24

Plaintiff,

25
26
27

vs.
VEEAM SOFTWARE CORPORATION
Defendant.

Case No. 3:12-cv-00700 SI (consolidated
for all purposes with Civil Action No. 1201035-SI)
Related Case No. 3:12-cv-05443 SI]
AMENDED STIPULATION TO
RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

28

AMENDED STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1
2

WHEREAS on January 11, 2013, Plaintiff Symantec Corporation and Defendant Veeam

3

Software Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Parties”) stipulated, filed and submitted to the

4

Court a Stipulation to Reschedule the Case Management Conference [Docket No. 93]

5

(“Stipulation”).

6

WHEREAS the Stipulation stated that the Case Management Conference the Parties sought

7

to continue was scheduled for February 1, 2013. The Further Case Management Conference in this

8

case is actually scheduled for February 15, 2013 at 3:00 p.m.

9

WHEREAS, the Initial Case Management Conference in Symantec Corporation v. Veeam

10

Software Corporation, Case No. 3:12 –CV-05443, which is related to this action, is set for February

11

1, 2013 at 2:30 p.m.

12
13

WHEREAS, Veeam’s counsel is unavailable on February 1, 2013 and Symantec’s counsel is
unavailable on February 15, 2013.

14

WHEREAS the Parties have agreed and respectfully request that the Initial Case

15

Management Conference scheduled for February 1, 2013 in related Case No. 3:12 –CV-05443 and

16

the Further Case Management Conference in this action scheduled for February 15, 2013 at 3:00

17

p.m. be rescheduled for the same date and time.

18

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed and propose that the Initial Case Management

19

Conference in related Case No. 3:12 –CV-05443 and the Further Case Management Conference in

20

this action be rescheduled for February 22, 2013 at 2:30 p.m.

21

Therefore the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, that:

22

1.

The Parties have agreed to continue the Further Case Management Conference to

23

be heard on the same date as the Initial Case Management Conference scheduled in the related

24

case [3:12-cv-05443 SI];

25
26

2.

The Parties are available for the Further Case Management Conference on

February 22, 2013 at 2:30 p.m.; and

27
28
-1AMENDED STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

3.

1

The Parties jointly request that the Further Case Management Conference be

2

rescheduled to February 22, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. or on a date and time thereafter at the Court’s

3

convenience.

4
5

DATED: January 18, 2013

NIXON PEABODY LLP
By: /s/ GREGORY P. O’HARA
Gregory P. O’Hara (State Bar No. 131963)
2 Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 500
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 866.294.5752
Email: [e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10

Attorney for Defendant Veeam Software Corporation

11
12
13
14

DATED: January 18, 2013

15

QUINN, EMANUEL, URQUHART & SULLIVAN

18

By: /s/ JENNIFER A. KASH
Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. 203679)
[e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

19

Attorneys for Plaintiff Symantec Corporation.

16
17

20

14288612.1

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2AMENDED STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1
2
3

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby certify that concurrence in the filing of
this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories shown above.

4
5

/s/ Gregory P. O’Hara

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3AMENDED STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13
14

SYMANTEC CORPORATION,

15

Plaintiff,

16
17

Case No. 3:12-cv-00700 SI (consolidated
for all purposes with Civil Action No. 1201035-SI)
Related Case No. 3:12-cv-05443 SI]

vs.
VEEAM SOFTWARE CORPORATION
Defendant.

18

PROPOSED ORDER ON AMENDED
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

19

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

20

The Further Case Management Conference currently set for February 15, 2013 is

21
22

rescheduled to February 22, 2013 at 2:30 p.m.
DATED: January ___, 2013
22

23
24

By:
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28

14288612.1

PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING AMENDED STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE