The City & County of San Francisco v. United States Department of Transportation et al

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 27 EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/20/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

DENNIS J. HERRERA State Bar # 139669
City Attorney
THERESE M. STEWART State Bar # 104930
Chief Deputy City Attorney
DANNY CHOU State Bar # 180240
Chief of Complex and Special Litigation
KRISTINE A. POPLAWSKI, State Bar # 160758
KATHLEEN S. MORRIS, State Bar # 196672
Deputy City Attorneys
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, 7th Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
ATTORNEY GENERAL
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
United States Attorney
LEON W. WEIDMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
DAVID E. PINCHAS
Assistant United States Attorney
Room 7516 Federal Building
300 North Los Angeles Street
Los Angeles, California 9001
Telephone: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
California Bar # 130751
Attorneys for Defendants

20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

21

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO,
Plaintiff,
v.
The UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT,
OF TRANSPORTATION, et al.,
Defendants.
C 12-00711 RS ORDER

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. C 12-00711 RS
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO
RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

Good cause having been shown, the parties’ Stipulation to

2

Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff’s Amended

3

Complaint is GRANTED.

4

Complaint on or before September 20, 2012.

5
6

Defendants shall respond to the Amended

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 8/20/12

7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C 12-00711 RS ORDER

2