The City & County of San Francisco v. United States Department of Transportation et al

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 27 EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/20/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DENNIS J. HERRERA State Bar # 139669 City Attorney THERESE M. STEWART State Bar # 104930 Chief Deputy City Attorney DANNY CHOU State Bar # 180240 Chief of Complex and Special Litigation KRISTINE A. POPLAWSKI, State Bar # 160758 KATHLEEN S. MORRIS, State Bar # 196672 Deputy City Attorneys Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-3800 Facsimile: (415) 554-3985 E-Mail: danny.chou@sfgov.org Attorneys for Plaintiff THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney LEON W. WEIDMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division DAVID E. PINCHAS Assistant United States Attorney Room 7516 Federal Building 300 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles, California 9001 Telephone: (213) 894-2920 Fax Number: (213) 894-7819 California Bar # 130751 Attorneys for Defendants 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 21 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT, OF TRANSPORTATION, et al., Defendants. C 12-00711 RS ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 12-00711 RS ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 Good cause having been shown, the parties’ Stipulation to 2 Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff’s Amended 3 Complaint is GRANTED. 4 Complaint on or before September 20, 2012. 5 6 Defendants shall respond to the Amended IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 8/20/12 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C 12-00711 RS ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?