Meyer v. Matteucci et al

Filing 80

ORDER RELATING CASES. Signed by Judge Alsup on 8/30/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2016)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RELATED CASE ORDER
A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a
Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been
filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned
to case
12-cv-00734-WHA
Meyer v. Matteuccis
I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case
assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not
related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case
for a related case determination.
Case
Title
Related Not Related
16-cv-03010-WHO Meyer v. Litzenberg X
ORDER
The parties are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the
initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management
conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the
dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly.
Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local
Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to
govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned
judge.
Dated: August 30, 2016.

By: ________________________
William Alsup
United States District Judge

1