Wright et al v. Bloom et al

Filing 119

SECOND ORDER RE MOTION TO WITHDRAW re 109 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Difona Communication GMBH (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

VERN WRIGHT, JUNE WRIGHT, and
SUPERANTENNA CORPORATION,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14
15
16

SECOND ORDER RE
MOTION TO WITHDRAW

v.
MICHAEL BLOOM, JAIMEE BLOOM,
KINGSBRIDGE CORPORATION, OFFSHORE
SOLUTIONS, INC., SINOTECH
CORPORATION, DIFONA
COMMUNICATION GMBH, BULLIVANT
HOUSER BAILEY PC, and DOES 1–10,
Defendants.
/

17
18

No. C 12-00746 WHA

Counsel for Difona Communication GMBH’s motion to withdraw as counsel is currently

19

pending and is set for hearing on May 23 (Dkt. No. 109). The hearing on the motion will go

20

forward as scheduled. Counsel for Difona must make sure that Difona itself is aware of the

21

pending motion and is further aware that it has the right to appear and to be heard at the hearing.

22

Difona has appeared in this action via the filing of its answer. If Difona’s current counsel were

23

allowed to withdraw following the hearing (not a foregone conclusion), Difona’s continued

24

litigation in this action could only proceed through substituted counsel.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 10, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE