Mycone Dental Supply Co., Inc. v. Creative Nail Design, Inc.
Filing
117
STIPULATION AND ORDER GOVERNING E-DISCOVER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/18/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2013)
1
2
3
4
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
John M. Farrell (Cal. Bar. No. 99649)
farrell@fr.com
500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, CA 94063
Telephone: (650) 839-5070
Facsimile: (650) 839-5071
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
Jonathan E. Singer (Cal. Bar. No. 187908)
singer@fr.com
12390 El Camino Real
San Diego, CA 92130
Telephone: (858) 678-5070
Facsimile: (858) 678-5099
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim Defendants
12
VENABLE LLP
ADAM R. HESS (pro hac vice)
arhess@venable.com
CHRISTOPHER T. LA TESTA (pro hac
vice)
ctlatesta@venable.com
575 7th Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: (202) 344-4547
Facsimile: (202) 344-8300
FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP
CRAIG KAUFMAN (SBN 159458)
ckaufman@ftklaw.com
100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 730-5557
Attorneys for Defendant
CREATIVE NAIL DESIGN, INC.
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
16
MYCONE DENTAL SUPPLY CO., INC.,
D/B/A KEYSTONE RESEARCH &
PHARMACEUTICAL,
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:12-cv-00747-RS
STIPULATION AND ORDER
GOVERNING E-DISCOVERY
v.
CREATIVE NAIL DESIGN, INC.,
21
Defendant.
22
23
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.
24
25
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties and by their
26
27
respective undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that the following provisions
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER GOVERNING E-DISCOVERY
Case No. 3:12-cv-00747-RS
1
shall govern procedures for discovery of electronically-stored information (“ESI”) in the above-
2
captioned action.
3
4
I.
General Provisions
A. Preservation of Discoverable Information. A party has a common law obligation to
5
6
7
8
take reasonable and proportional steps to preserve discoverable information in the
party’s possession, custody or control.
i.
Absent a showing of good cause by the requesting party, the parties shall not be
9
required to modify, on a going-forward basis, the procedures used by them in the
10
ordinary course of business to back up and archive data; provided, however, that
11
12
the parties shall preserve the non-duplicative discoverable information currently
13
in their possession, custody or control.
14
ii.
Absent a showing of good cause by the requesting party, the categories of ESI
15
identified in Schedule A attached hereto need not be preserved.
16
17
B. Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection.
18
19
i.
Within 45 days of the entry of this Order, the parties are to confer on the nature
20
and scope of privilege logs for the case, including whether categories of
21
information may be excluded from any logging requirements and whether
22
alternatives to document-by-document logs can be exchanged.
23
24
ii.
Absent a showing of good cause by the requesting party, with respect to
25
information generated after the filing of the complaint, the parties are not
26
required to include any such information in privilege logs.
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER GOVERNING E-DISCOVERY
iii.
1
Activities undertaken in compliance with the duty to preserve information are
2
protected from disclosure and discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3)(A) and
3
(B).
4
iv.
5
Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(d), the inadvertent production of privileged or
6
work product protected ESI is not a waiver in the pending case or in any other
7
federal or state proceeding.
8
Information that contains privileged matter or
attorney work product shall be immediately returned to the producing party if it
9
is clear on its face that it was inadvertently produced, or if written notice is
10
provided by the producing party within 5 business days of the producing party
11
learning of the inadvertent production.
12
13
v.
The receiving party shall not use ESI that the producing party asserts is attorney-
14
client privileged or work product protected to challenge the privilege or
15
protection.
16
17
18
II.
Specific E–Discovery Issues
A.
On-site inspection of electronic media. Such an inspection shall not be permitted
19
absent a demonstration by the requesting party of specific need and good cause.
20
21
B.
Search methodology. If the producing party elects to use search terms to locate
22
potentially responsive ESI (including e-mail), it shall disclose the search terms to the requesting
23
party. A requesting party may request no more than 10 additional terms to be used in connection
24
with the electronic search within 10 days after receiving the producing party’s list of search terms.
25
One set of search terms, per producing party, shall be used with respect to both this matter and the
26
ongoing litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, captioned as Mycone
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER GOVERNING E-DISCOVERY
1
Dental Supply Co., Inc. d/b/a Keystone Research & Pharmaceutical v. Creative Nail Design, Inc. et
2
al., Case No. 1:11-cv-04380-JBS-KMW (“the New Jersey Case”).
3
4
In addition, for good cause shown, a requesting party may request additional search terms
outside of the 10-day period. The parties will meet and confer within 5 days of the request to
5
6
discuss any such additional search terms. If the parties cannot agree to the additional search terms,
7
either party shall have the option of moving the Court for resolution of the outstanding issues. With
8
respect to the additional terms, focused terms, rather than over-broad terms shall be employed. The
9
additional search terms shall be narrowly tailored to particular issues. Indiscriminate terms, such as
10
the producing company’s name or its product name, are inappropriate unless combined with
11
narrowing search criteria that sufficiently reduce the risk of overproduction.
A conjunctive
12
combination of multiple words or phrases (e.g., “computer” and “system”) narrows the search and
13
14
shall count as a single search term. A disjunctive combination of multiple words or phrases (e.g.,
15
“computer” or “system”) broadens the search, and thus each word or phrase shall count as a
16
separate search term unless they are variants or up to 3 synonyms (e.g. “automobile” or “auto” or
17
“car”) of the same word. Use of narrowing search criteria (e.g., “and,” “but not,” “w/x”) is
18
encouraged to limit the production and shall be considered when determining whether to shift costs
19
for disproportionate discovery. If the additional search terms result in an unreasonable number of
20
documents to be reviewed and/or produced, the parties shall confer in order to revise the additional
21
22
23
search terms.
C.
ESI custodians and collection. Absent a showing of good cause by the requesting
24
party, each party shall collect and produce ESI from a minimum of 10 custodians total in this matter
25
and the New Jersey Case. The parties may jointly agree to modify this limit without the Court’s
26
leave. Within 14 days of entry of this Order, the parties shall confer regarding the appropriate
27
custodians from whom to collect documents. Consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
28
4
STIPULATION AND ORDER GOVERNING E-DISCOVERY
1
nothing in this Order shall bar a party from requesting another party to search for ESI from a
2
particular custodian beyond the custodians identified under this Section based on a showing of good
3
cause.
4
For each custodian, the parties shall collect from all reasonably accessible data sources
5
6
within the party’s possession, custody or control specifically associated with that custodian,
7
including, without limitation, the custodian’s email files (whether located on an email server, the
8
custodian’s local hard drive, or in other archive or server locations), electronic files from the
9
custodian’s hard drive(s), and electronic files from any server location(s) specifically assigned for
10
use by the custodian. Absent a showing of good cause by the requesting party, the parties shall not
11
be obligated to conduct enterprise-wide searches for all emails to or from any of their identified
12
custodians. Absent a showing of good cause by the requesting party, the parties shall not be
13
14
15
16
obligated to collect ESI from backup tapes, but shall be obligated to maintain such non-duplicative
backup tapes in the event a showing of good cause is made.
Each party shall inquire with its identified custodians about the existence of any general
17
company document sources or repositories (both electronic and hardcopy) that may contain relevant
18
documents. With respect to any such source identified, the party shall collect and produce
19
documents from those sources in conformance with the provisions herein. Absent a showing of
20
good cause by the requesting party, the parties are not obligated to collect from shared ESI sources
21
22
that are accessible to the custodian and other employees (such as shared directories or company
23
databases to which the custodian has access) if the custodian does not identify the shared source as
24
one that may contain relevant documents.
25
Once collected, ESI may be de-duplicated prior to keyword searching. De-duplication may
26
include (1) de-duplication across the data set without regard to custodian (“exact de-duplication”),
27
and (2) de-duplication of email files that are portions of longer email chains (“near de-
28
5
STIPULATION AND ORDER GOVERNING E-DISCOVERY
1
duplication”). If a party employs near de-duplication, it will (i) review all portions of any email
2
chain for responsiveness and privilege, (ii) produce all non-privileged portions of an email chain if
3
any embedded email contained in the chain is responsive, and (iii) redact only those portions of a
4
responsive email chain that are privileged or otherwise subject to redaction under the terms of this
5
6
agreement.
D.
7
Format.
ESI and non-ESI shall be produced to the requesting party as text-
8
searchable image files (e.g., TIFF). When a text-searchable image file is produced, the producing
9
party must preserve the integrity of the underlying ESI, i.e., the original formatting. The parties
10
shall produce their information in the following format: single page TIFF images and associated
11
multi-page text files containing extracted text or OCR with Concordance and Opticon load files.
12
E.
Native files. Absent a showing of good cause by the requesting party, the only files
13
14
15
that should be produced in native format are files not easily converted to image format, such as
Excel and Access files.
F.
16
Metadata files. The parties are not obligated to provide metadata except upon
17
request by the receiving party and upon a showing of good cause. Upon such request and with good
18
cause shown, the following metadata need only be produced, to the extent such metadata exists:
19
Custodian, File Path, Email Subject, From, To, CC, BCC, Date Sent, Time Sent, Date Received,
20
Time Received, Filename, Author, Date Created, Date Modified, MD5 Hash, File Size, File
21
22
Extension, Control Number Begin, Control Number End, Attachment Range, Attachment Begin,
23
and Attachment End (or the equivalent thereof).
24
G.
25
party, the parties agree to the production of final, rather than draft, marketing, licensing, and/or
26
financial materials. The parties also agree to the initial production of summary financial materials
27
Financial and Marketing Materials. Absent a showing of good cause by the requesting
in lieu of all invoices, receipts, purchase orders, etc.
28
6
STIPULATION AND ORDER GOVERNING E-DISCOVERY
1
SO STIPULATED:
2
Dated: March 15, 2013
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
/s/ Jonathan E. Singer
John M. Farrell (No. 99649)
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
farrell@fr.com
500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, CA 94063
Telephone: (650) 839-5070
Facsimile: (650) 839-5071
/s/ Craig R. Kaufman
Craig R. Kaufman (SBN 159458)
FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP
Email: ckaufman@ftklaw.com
100 Marine Parkway
Suite 200
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 730-5557
Jonathan E. Singer (No. 187908)
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
singer@fr.com
12390 El Camino Real
San Diego, CA 92130
Telephone: (858) 678-5070
Facsimile: (858) 678-5099
Adam R. Hess (pro hac vice)
Christopher T. la Testa (pro hac vice)
VENABLE LLP
575 7th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004
(202) 344-4547
arhess@venable.com
ctlatesta@venable.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Third-Party Defendants
Attorneys for Defendant
Creative Nail Design, Inc.
15
FILER’S ATTESTATION
16
17
I, Craig R. Kaufman, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to
18
file this STIPULATION AND ORDER GOVERNING E-DISCOVERY. In compliance with
19
General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that counsel for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendants
20
concur in this filing.
By: /s/ Craig R. Kaufman
Craig R. Kaufman
21
22
23
24
25
18th
March
SO ORDERED, this ___________ day of _____________, 2013.
26
_________________________________
Richard Seeborg
United States District Court Judge
27
28
7
STIPULATION AND ORDER GOVERNING E-DISCOVERY
SCHEDULE A
1
2
1.
Deleted, slack, fragmented, or other data only accessible by forensics.
2.
Random access memory (RAM), temporary files, or other ephemeral data
3
4
5
that are difficult to preserve without disabling the operating system.
6
3.
On-line access data such as temporary internet files, history, cache,
7
cookies, and the like.
8
9
10
4.
Data in metadata fields that are frequently updated automatically, such as
last-opened dates.
11
5.
12
13
Back-up data that are substantially duplicative of data that are more
accessible elsewhere.
14
6.
16
17
Voice messages.
7.
15
Instant messages that are not ordinarily printed or maintained in a server
dedicated to instant messaging.
18
8.
19
Electronic mail or pin-to-pin messages sent to or from mobile devices
20
(e.g., iPhone and Blackberry devices), provided that a copy of such mail is routinely saved
21
elsewhere.
22
23
24
9.
Other electronic data stored on a mobile device, such as calendar or
contact data or notes, provided that a copy of such information is routinely saved elsewhere.
25
10.
Logs of calls made from mobile devices.
11.
Server, system or network logs.
26
27
28
8
STIPULATION AND ORDER GOVERNING E-DISCOVERY
12.
2
System-generated files or other file types not containing end user-created
13.
1
Electronic data temporarily stored by laboratory equipment or attached
data.
3
4
5
electronic equipment, provided that such data is not ordinarily preserved as part of a laboratory
6
report.
7
8
9
14.
Data remaining from systems no longer in use that is unintelligible on the
systems in use.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
STIPULATION AND ORDER GOVERNING E-DISCOVERY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?