Mycone Dental Supply Co., Inc. v. Creative Nail Design, Inc.

Filing 162

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/23/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 VENABLE LLP ADAM R. HESS (pro hac vice) Email: arhess@venable.com CHRISTOPHER T. LA TESTA (pro hac vice) Email: ctlatesta@venable.com 575 7th Street N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: (202) 344-4547 Facsimile: (202) 344-8300 6 7 8 9 FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP CRAIG KAUFMAN (SBN 159458) Email: ckaufman@ftklaw.com 100 Marine Parkway Suite 200 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 730-5557 10 11 Attorneys for Defendant CREATIVE NAIL DESIGN, INC. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 18 MYCONE DENTAL SUPPLY CO., INC., D/B/A/ KEYSTONE RESEARCH & PHARMACEUTICAL, Plaintiff, 19 20 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND PROTECTIVE ORDER vs. 21 Case No. 3:12-cv-00747-RS CREATIVE NAIL DESIGN, INC., 22 23 Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00747 RS 1 2 WHEREAS, on December 3, 2012, the Court entered a Stipulated Protective Order (Docket No. 93); and 3 4 WHEREAS, the Stipulated Protective Order governs discovery and confidentiality in the above-captioned action for all named parties; 5 6 WHEREAS, third parties have been served and will be served with discovery that calls for the production of Confidential Information; and 7 WHEREAS, a third party has requested a modification of the Stipulated Protective Order 8 that the third party deems necessary to ensure that its Confidential Information is adequately 9 protected; 10 Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Creative Nail Design, Inc. (“CND”), Plaintiff Mycone 11 Dental Supply Co., Inc. (“Keystone”), and Counterclaim Defendants Young Nails, Inc., Cacee, 12 Inc. and Nail Systems International (“Counterclaim Defendants”), by and through their respective 13 counsel, hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the Court’s approval, that the Stipulated Protective 14 Order shall be amended as follows: 15 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 16 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things (a) that contain private or confidential personal 17 information, or (b) that contain information received in confidence from third parties, or (c) 18 which the producing party otherwise believes in good faith to be entitled to protection under Rule 19 26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 20 2.8 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 21 Information or Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential” Information or Items pertaining to (a) 22 technical materials, methods, or processes that are or could be used by a producing party to 23 manufacture its products, the disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a 24 substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means or (b) trade 25 secrets, competitively sensitive technical, marketing, financial, sales or other confidential 26 business information. 27 /// 28 /// 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00747 RS 1 IT IS ST STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 2 3 Dated: October 23, 2013 FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP 4 By:/s/ Craig R. Kaufman Craig R. Kaufman Attorney for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff CREATIVE NAIL DESIGN, INC. 5 6 7 8 9 Dated: October 23, 2013 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 10 By:/s/John M. Farrell John M. Farrell Attorney for Plaintiff MYCONE DENTAL SUPPLY CO., INC. D/B/A KEYSTONE RESEARCH & PHARMACEUTICALS 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 Dated: 10/23/13 20 21 22 The Honorable Richard Seeborg United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00747 RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?