Mycone Dental Supply Co., Inc. v. Creative Nail Design, Inc.

Filing 75

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. Claims Construction Hearing set for 2/27/2013 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/22/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 9 10 MYCONE DENTAL SUPPLY CO., INC., 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. No. C 12-00747 RS CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER CREATIVE NAIL DESIGN, INC., Defendant. ____________________________________/ Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Case Management 16 17 Conference was held on June 21, 2012. After considering the Joint Case Management Statement 18 submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record and good cause appearing, IT 19 IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. 20 21 completed by the parties. Discovery shall be limited as follows: A. INTERROGATORIES. Keystone, NSI, Young Nails and Cacee may together serve 22 23 DISCOVERY. On or before June 28, 2013, all non-expert discovery shall be up to 15 joint interrogatories and may each serve an additional 5 individual interrogatories. Creative Nail Design may serve up to 20 joint interrogatories on opposing parties and may 24 additionally serve up to 10 interrogatories separately to each of Keystone, NSI, Young Nails and 25 26 27 Cacee. B. REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION. Keystone, NSI, Young Nails and Cacee may together serve up to 30 requests for admission and may each serve an additional five individual 28 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 requests. Creative Nail Design may serve up to 40 joint requests for admission on opposing parties and may additionally serve up to 10 requests for admission separately to each of Keystone, NSI, Young Nails and Cacee. C. DEPOSITION DAYS. Keystone, NSI, Young Nails and Cacee together are limited to 10 deposition days. Creative Nail Design is limited to 12 deposition days. 2. EXPERT WITNESSES. The parties shall be limited to no more than 5 testifying 7 expert witnesses per side. The disclosure and discovery of expert witness opinions shall proceed 8 as follows: 9 A. On or before May 3, 2013, the parties shall exchange all expert reports. 10 B. On or before May 31, 2013, the parties shall exchange all rebuttal expert reports. 11 C. On or before July 26, 2013, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule 12 13 14 of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed. 3. AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS. All amendments to the pleadings must be completed on or before July 6, 2012. 15 4. 16 A. All invalidity contentions shall be due no later than August 31, 2012. 17 B. The parties shall exchange proposed terms for construction no later than September 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULING. 19, 2012 in accordance with Patent L.R. 4-1(b). C. The parties shall exchange preliminary claim constructions and extrinsic evidence no later than October 10, 2012. D. The parties shall file their joint claim construction and prehearing statement no later than November 14, 2012. E. Claim construction discovery shall be completed no later than December 14, 2012. F. The opening claim construction brief must be submitted no later than January 9, 2013. G. The responsive claim construction brief with support must be submitted no later than 26 January 30, 2013. 27 H. The claim construction reply brief must be submitted no later than February 8, 2013. 28 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 1 2 I. A Claim Construction Hearing shall take place in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California on February 27, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 Dated: 6/22/12 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?