Infostream Group, Inc. et al v. Paypal, Inc.
Filing
61
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT. Show Cause Response due by 11/6/2013. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 30, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
INFOSTREAM GROUP, INC., et al.,
Case No. 12-cv-00748-JST
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
PAYPAL, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE
IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE
JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT
SHOULD NOT IMPOSE SANCTIONS:
On April 3, 2013, this Court held an initial case management conference in this action and
15
set a case scheduling order that includes a pretrial conference on November 8, 2013, at 2:00 p.m.
16
ECF No. 58. Trial is scheduled to begin on November 18, 2013, at 8:30 a.m.
17
This Court held a case management conference on October 10, 2013, during which the
18
parties informed the Court that they are in the process of working on a settlement agreement. The
19
Court maintained all existing deadlines, including the pretrial conference scheduled for
20
November 8, 2013. ECF No. 60. The Plaintiffs have not filed a notice of settlement or otherwise
21
moved to continue or vacate any deadline.
22
Section B of this Court’s standing order for civil jury trials, available at
23
cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders, required the parties to file a joint pretrial statement and proposed
24
order no later than ten days prior to the pretrial conference, which in this case means by October
25
29, 2013. The parties did not file a pretrial statement.
26
The parties shall file their joint pretrial statement and proposed order forthwith.
27
The parties are also hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not
28
1
impose monetary sanctions, dismiss this action, or impose other sanctions, for failure to comply
2
with a court order, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Yourish v. California
3
Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 1999).
4
A response to the Order to Show Cause must be filed with seven days of this Order.
5
Failure to respond to this Order will constitute an additional ground for the imposition of
6
7
8
appropriate sanctions, including involuntarily dismissal with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 30, 2013
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?