VMware, Inc. et al v. Systemify, LLC

Filing 29

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 7/30/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Katherine K. Lutton (SBN 194971)
[e-mail]
Shelley K. Mack (SBN 209596)
[e-mail]
Leeron G. Kalay (SBN 233579)
[e-mail]
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, CA 94063
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
VMWARE, INC. and PACKETMOTION, INC.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Scott E. Stevens, Esq.
[e-mail]
Gregory P. Love, Esq.
[e-mail]
Darrell G. Dotson, Esq.
[e-mail]
STEVENS LOVE
222 N. Fredonia Street
P.O. Box 3427
Longview, TX 75601
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

15
16

Attorneys for Defendant
SYSTEMIFY, LLC

17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NOTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

19
20

VMWARE, INC. and PACKETMOTION, INC.,

Case No. 3:12-cv-00749-SI

21
Plaintiffs,

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

22
v.
23
SYSTEMIFY, LLC,
24
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
1

[PROP] ORDER GRANTING
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 3:12-cv-00749-SI

1

Before this Court is Plaintiffs VMware, Inc. and PacketMotion, Inc.’s and Defendant

2

Systemify, LLC’s Joint Stipulation of Dismissal. After reviewing the Joint Stipulation and for good

3
4

cause shown, the Court is of the opinion that the stipulated dismissal should be granted.
Therefore, the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Dismissal is APPROVED. Plaintiffs’ claims for

5
6
7
8

declaratory judgment of noninfringement and invalidity are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

7/30/12
DATED:_____________________

_______________________________
The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Court Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

[PROP] ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 3:12-cv-00749-SI