Benson v. Citibank, N.A. et al

Filing 46

ORDER RE: SCHEDULING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 4/2/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13

LLOYD F. BENSON, III,

14
15

Plaintiff,
v.

16
17
18

Case No.: 12-cv-760 JSC
ORDER RE: SCHEDULING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT

CITIBANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

On March 25, 2013, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause as to why this action
should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
41(b) based on Plaintiff’s failure to file an opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 35). (Dkt. No. 41.) Plaintiff has filed a
response to the order to show cause and a belated opposition to Defendants’ motion. (Dkt.
Nos. 44 & 45.)
Defendants’ reply, if any, to Plaintiff’s opposition is now due April 9, 2013. The
hearing on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management Conference are reset for
April 18, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom F, 450 Golden Gate Ave. San Francisco, California.

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

Dated: April 2, 2013
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2