Benson v. Citibank, N.A. et al

Filing 64

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 8/19/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 8/12/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12

LLOYD F. BENSON, III,
Plaintiff,

13
14

Case No.: 12-cv-760 JSC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

15
16

CITIBANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

17
18
19

On July 23, 2013, the Court lifted the litigation stay and set a briefing schedule on

20

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 63.)

21

Plaintiff’s opposition was due August 5, 2013, but to date, Plaintiff has not filed an

22

Opposition or Statement of non-opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, as required by Local

23

Rule 7-3(b).

24

Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE as to why this

25

action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff should file a response to the

26

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE, along with a response to the Motion to Dismiss, on or before

27

August 19, 2013. If no response is received, this action may be dismissed with prejudice,

28

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute.

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 12, 2013
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2