Ahmmed v. Bank of America N.A. et al

Filing 43

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION TO REMAND AND MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/25/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MOHSIN AHMMED, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 Plaintiff, No. C 12-00789 JSW v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A. ET AL, ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION TO REMAND AND MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. / 14 15 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the motion to remand and 16 motion to dismiss which have been noticed for hearing on Friday, June 1, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., are 17 appropriate for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing date is hereby 18 VACATED. The motions will be taken under submission and decided on the papers. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 25, 2012 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 AHMMED et al, Plaintiff, 8 9 Case Number: CV12-00789 JSW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 BANK OF AMERICA N.A. et al, Defendant. / 12 13 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. 14 That on May 25, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing 15 said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office 16 delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 17 18 Mohsin Ahmmed 425 1st St., Unit 2104 19 San Francisco, CA 94105 20 21 Dated: May 25, 2012 22 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?