Ahmmed v. Bank of America N.A. et al
Filing
43
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION TO REMAND AND MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/25/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
MOHSIN AHMMED,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. C 12-00789 JSW
v.
BANK OF AMERICA N.A. ET AL,
ORDER VACATING HEARING
ON MOTION TO REMAND AND
MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendants.
/
14
15
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the motion to remand and
16
motion to dismiss which have been noticed for hearing on Friday, June 1, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., are
17
appropriate for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing date is hereby
18
VACATED. The motions will be taken under submission and decided on the papers.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 25, 2012
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7 AHMMED et al,
Plaintiff,
8
9
Case Number: CV12-00789 JSW
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10 BANK OF AMERICA N.A. et al,
Defendant.
/
12
13 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
14
That on May 25, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
15 said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
16 delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
17
18 Mohsin Ahmmed
425 1st St., Unit 2104
19 San Francisco, CA 94105
20
21 Dated: May 25, 2012
22
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?