High Tek USA, Inc. v. Heat and Control, Inc.

Filing 73

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 72 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME.Case Management Conference continued to 11/27/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Expert discovery deadlines extened. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/15/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ROBERT S. SHWARTS (STATE BAR NO. 196803) rshwarts@orrick.com RUSSELL P. COHEN (STATE BAR NO. 213105) rcohen@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, California 94105-2669 Telephone: +1-415-773-5700 Facsimile: +1-415-773-5759 Attorneys for Defendant HEAT AND CONTROL, INC. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 HIGH TEK USA, INC., a California corporation, 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:12-cv-805-WHO STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 AND ORDER HEAT AND CONTROL, INC., a California corporation, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND ORDER – CASE NO. 3:12-CV-805-WHO 1 Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-2, plaintiff High Tek USA, Inc. 2 (“High Tek”) and defendant Heat and Control, Inc. (“Heat and Control”) jointly submit this 3 Stipulated Request for Changing Time and hereby stipulate as follows: 4 WHEREAS, on April 9, 2013, the Honorable Jon S. Tigar entered a Scheduling Order 5 setting the expert rebuttal deadline for November 22, 2013 and setting the expert discovery cut- 6 off for December 6, 2013. [Docket No. 57] 7 8 9 10 WHEREAS, on August 22, 2013, this Court adopted the case management schedule set by Judge Tigar without revision. [Docket No. 63] WHEREAS, on August 22, 2013, this Court also set a case management conference for November 19, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. 11 WHEREAS, due to counsels’ schedules, additional time is required to complete rebuttal 12 reports and depositions, and an alternative date requested for the case management conference. 13 WHEREAS, the parties’ proposed extensions to the case management conference, the 14 expert rebuttal deadline, and the expert discovery cut-off will not impact any other date or 15 deadline set by the Scheduling Order or by Local Rule. 16 17 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED and AGREED, and the parties ask the Court to adopt as its order the following: 18 19 STIPULATION The case management conference shall be set for November 26, 2013, the deadline for 20 rebuttal expert reports shall be set for November 27, 2013, and the deadline for expert discovery 21 shall be set for December 20, 2013. 22 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND ORDER – CASE NO. 3:12-CV-805-WHO 1 Dated: November 14, 2013 2 ROBERT S. SHWARTS RUSSELL P. COHEN Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 3 By: 4 5 6 Dated: November 14, 2013 7 8 JENNIFER RANDLETT MADDEN ANTHONY L. VIGNOLO CAROLINE M. COLANGELO Downey Brand LLP By: 9 RUSSELL P. COHEN Attorneys for Defendant HEAT AND CONTROL, INC. 10 Matthew J. Weber Attorneys for Plaintiff HIGH TEK USA, INC. 11 12 I, Russell Cohen, am the ECF User whose User ID and password are being used to file 13 this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that the above-listed 14 signatories have concurred in this filing. /s/ Russell P. Cohen 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND ORDER – CASE NO. 3:12-CV-805-WHO 1 2 3 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: November 15, 2013 ________________________________ William H. Orrick United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME AND ORDER – CASE NO. 3:12-CV-805-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?