Frid v. First Republic Bank et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 34 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Setting Forth Briefing Schedule for Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate filed by First Republic Bank, Olga Frid, Samdani Shaik. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 9, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2013)

1 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
JAHMAL T. DAVIS, SBN 191504
2 [e-mail]
JANE M. FEDDES, SBN 282117
3 425 Market Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
4 Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
5
Attorneys for Defendants
6 FIRST REPUBLIC BANK and
SAMDANI SHAIK
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12 OLGA FRID,
13
14

Case No. CV 12-0806 JST
Plaintiff,

JOINT STIPULATION SETTING FORTH
SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
TO VACATE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

v.

15 FIRST REPUBLIC BANK, a California
Corporation and SAMDANI SHAIK, an
16 individual, and DOES 1- 10, inclusive,

Judge:

Hon. Jon S. Tigar

Trial Date:
17

Not set

Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5871321.1

Plaintiff Olga Frid (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), through her attorneys of record, Smith Patten
and Defendants First Republic Bank and Samdani Shaik (hereinafter "Defendants") (collectively,
the "Parties"), through their attorneys of record, Hanson Bridgett LLP, pursuant to Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate and agree to the briefing schedule set forth
below for Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate. The matter was sent to arbitration by this Court. The
arbitration concluded on April 30, 2013. The arbitrator issued his final decision on June 17, 2013
and further supplemented that decision on September 13, 2013.
NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff intends to file a Motion to Vacate Award pursuant to 9
U.S.C. Section 10(a)(4). The Parties have agreed to the following briefing schedule:
-1JOINT STIPULATION SETTING FORTH SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VACATE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (CASE NO. CV 12-0806 JST)

1

Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate:

November 27, 2013

2

Defendant's Opposition:

December 11, 2013

3

Plaintiff's Reply:

December 20, 2013

4

Hearing Date:

As set by the Court

5 The Parties respectfully request the Court issue an order setting forth the above-outlined briefing
6 schedule for Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate the Award.
7
8 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
9
DATED: October 7, 2013

SMITH PATTEN

10
11
By:

12
13
14
15

DATED: October 7, 2013

/s/ Dow W. Patten
DOW PATTEN
SPENCER SMITH
Attorneys Plaintiff
OLGA FRID
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

16
17

19
20
21

/s/ Jane M. Feddes
JAHMAL T. DAVIS
JANE M. FEDDES
Attorneys for Defendants
FIRST REPUBLIC BANK and
SAMDANI SHAIK

25

October 9
Dated: ___________________, 2013

UNIT
ED

24

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

23

S

22 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

D
RDERE

O
T IS SO
HON. JON S.ITIGAR

R NIA

By:

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

ER

A

H

-2-

i ga r

LI

RT

28
5871321.1

n S. T
J u d ge J o

NO

27

FO

26

N

F

C

JOINT STIPULATION SETTING FORTH SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION T O
D I S T C TO VACATE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (CASE NO. CV 12-0806 JST)R I