Frid v. First Republic Bank et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 34 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Setting Forth Briefing Schedule for Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate filed by First Republic Bank, Olga Frid, Samdani Shaik. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 9, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2013)

Download PDF
1 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP JAHMAL T. DAVIS, SBN 191504 2 JANE M. FEDDES, SBN 282117 3 425 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 4 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 Facsimile: (415) 541-9366 5 Attorneys for Defendants 6 FIRST REPUBLIC BANK and SAMDANI SHAIK 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 OLGA FRID, 13 14 Case No. CV 12-0806 JST Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION SETTING FORTH SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VACATE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER v. 15 FIRST REPUBLIC BANK, a California Corporation and SAMDANI SHAIK, an 16 individual, and DOES 1- 10, inclusive, Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar Trial Date: 17 Not set Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5871321.1 Plaintiff Olga Frid (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), through her attorneys of record, Smith Patten and Defendants First Republic Bank and Samdani Shaik (hereinafter "Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), through their attorneys of record, Hanson Bridgett LLP, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate and agree to the briefing schedule set forth below for Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate. The matter was sent to arbitration by this Court. The arbitration concluded on April 30, 2013. The arbitrator issued his final decision on June 17, 2013 and further supplemented that decision on September 13, 2013. NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff intends to file a Motion to Vacate Award pursuant to 9 U.S.C. Section 10(a)(4). The Parties have agreed to the following briefing schedule: -1JOINT STIPULATION SETTING FORTH SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VACATE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (CASE NO. CV 12-0806 JST) 1 Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate: November 27, 2013 2 Defendant's Opposition: December 11, 2013 3 Plaintiff's Reply: December 20, 2013 4 Hearing Date: As set by the Court 5 The Parties respectfully request the Court issue an order setting forth the above-outlined briefing 6 schedule for Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate the Award. 7 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 9 DATED: October 7, 2013 SMITH PATTEN 10 11 By: 12 13 14 15 DATED: October 7, 2013 /s/ Dow W. Patten DOW PATTEN SPENCER SMITH Attorneys Plaintiff OLGA FRID HANSON BRIDGETT LLP 16 17 19 20 21 /s/ Jane M. Feddes JAHMAL T. DAVIS JANE M. FEDDES Attorneys for Defendants FIRST REPUBLIC BANK and SAMDANI SHAIK 25 October 9 Dated: ___________________, 2013 UNIT ED 24 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 23 S 22 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. D RDERE O T IS SO HON. JON S.ITIGAR R NIA By: 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ER A H -2- i ga r LI RT 28 5871321.1 n S. T J u d ge J o NO 27 FO 26 N F C JOINT STIPULATION SETTING FORTH SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION T O D I S T C TO VACATE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (CASE NO. CV 12-0806 JST)R I

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?