Negrete v. Lewis et al
Filing
12
ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/28/13. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2013)
*E-Filed 1/29/13*
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
5
6
SALVADOR NEGRETE,
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA
PAUPERIS STATUS
v.
G.D. LEWIS, et al.,
Defendants.
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 12-0809 RS (PR)
/
11
12
This closed federal civil rights action is on appeal. The Court of Appeals has referred
13
the matter to this Court for a determination whether plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (“IFP”)
14
status should continue for this appeal. This Court determines that it should not. There are no
15
valid grounds on which an appeal can be based. Consequently, the Court certifies that any
16
appeal taken from the order of dismissal and judgment of this action will not be taken in good
17
faith and is therefore frivolous. Fed. R. App. P. (“FRAP”) 24(a)(3)(A); Ellis v. United States,
18
356 U.S. 674, 674– 75 (1958); Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir.
19
2002). Accordingly, plaintiff’s IFP status is hereby REVOKED. The Clerk shall forthwith
20
notify plaintiff and the Court of Appeals of this order. See FRAP 24(a)(4). Plaintiff may file
21
a motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal in the Court of Appeals within thirty days after
22
service of notice of this order. See FRAP 24(a)(5). Any such motion “must include a copy
23
of the affidavit filed in the district court and the district court’s statement of reasons for its
24
action.” Id.
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 28, 2013
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
28
No. C 12-0809 RS (PR)
ORDER REVOKING IFP STATUS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?