Verinata Health, Inc. et al v. Sequenom, Inc. et al
Filing
173
ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting #172 Stipulation and ORDER REGARDING CUSTODIAL DISCOVERY DEADLINE (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2014)
1 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
Edward R. Reines (135960)
2 (edward.reines@weil.com)
Derek C. Walter (246322)
3 (derek.walter@weil.com)
Michele A. Gauger (281769)
4 (michele.gauger@weil.com)
Anant N. Pradhan (287227)
5 (anant.pradhan@weil.com)
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
6 Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-3000
7 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100
8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim
Defendants
9 VERINATA HEALTH, INC. and
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
10 LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR
UNIVERSITY
11
13
14 VERINATA HEALTH, INC. and
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
15 LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR
UNIVERSITY
16
Plaintiffs,
17
v.
18 SEQUENOM, INC., and SEQUENOM
CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE
19 LLC,
20
Defendants/CounterclaimClaimants,
v.
22 VERINATA HEALTH, INC. and
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
23 LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR
UNIVERSITY,
24
Counterclaim-Defendants,
25 and
26 ISIS INNOVATION LIMITED
27
28
Attorneys for Defendants and CounterclaimPlaintiffs
SEQUENOM, INC. and
SEQUENOM CENTER FOR MOLECULAR
MEDICINE LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
21
KAYE SCHOLER LLP
Michael J. Malecek (171034)
(michael.malecek@kayescholer.com)
Peter E. Root (142348)
(peter,root@kayescholer,com)
Stephen C. Holmes (200727)
(stephen.holmes@kayescholer.com)
Two Palo Alto Square,
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400
Palo Alto, California 94306
Telephone:
(650) 319-4500
Facsimile:
(650) 319-4700
Nominal CounterclaimDefendant.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING CUSTODIAL DISCOVERY
DEADLINE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:12-cv-00865-SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODIAL
DISCOVERY DEADLINE
Judge: Hon. Susan Illston
Case No. 3:12-cv-00865-SI
1
Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants Verinata Health, Inc. (“Verinata”), The Board of
2 Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University (“Stanford”), and Defendants and Counterclaim3 Plaintiffs Sequenom. Inc. and Sequenom Center for Molecular Medicine, LLC (“Sequenom”),
4 (collectively, the “Parties”) by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as
5 follows:
6
WHEREAS, the Parties previously agreed to complete production of custodial documents
7 by March 7, 2014,
8
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to continue producing custodial documents on a
9 rolling basis,
10
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to complete production of all custodial documents by
11 March 27, 2014,
12
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through
13 their respective counsel, and subject to the Court’s approval, that the deadline to complete
14 production of custodial documents is extended to March 27, 2014.
15
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
16
17
Respectfully submitted,
18 Dated: March 13, 2014
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
19
By:
20
21
22
23 Dated: March 13, 2014
/s/ Derek C. Walter
Derek C. Walter
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Verinata Health, Inc. and The Board
of Trustees of the Leland Stanford
Junior University
KAYE SCHOLER LLP
24
By:
25
26
27
/s/ Michael Malecek
Michael Malecek
Attorneys for Defendants and
Counterclaim Plaintiffs
Sequenom, Inc. and Sequenom
Center for Molecular Medicine LLC
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING CUSTODIAL DISCOVERY
DEADLINE
Case No. 3:12-cv-00865-SI
CERTIFICATION
1
I, Derek C. Walter, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to
2
3 file this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Michael
4 Malecek has concurred in this filing.
5 Dated: March 13, 2014
/s/ Derek C. Walter
Derek C. Walter
6
7
8 IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10 Dated:
3/13/14
Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Court Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING CUSTODIAL DISCOVERY
DEADLINE
-3-
Case No. 3:12-cv-00865-SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?