Verinata Health, Inc. et al v. Sequenom, Inc. et al

Filing 203

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION REGARDING SERVICE #201 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/17/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

13
14

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION REGARDING
SERVICE

Plaintiffs,

11
12

No. C 12-00865 SI

VERINATA HEALTH, INC., et al.,

v.
SEQUENOM, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

/

15
On May 20, 2014, plaintiffs filed a first supplemental complaint, adding Chinese University of
16
Hong Kong (“CUHK”) as a defendant. Docket No. 186. On June 12, 2014, plaintiffs filed a motion for
17
an order confirming service upon CUHK by publication or, in the alternative, for an order directing
18
CUHK’s counsel to accept service on behalf of CUHK. Docket No. 201. On June 16, 2014, CUHK
19
filed a response stating that it agrees to accept service of the first amended complaint and summons
20
effective June 12, 2014 provided that the Court issues an order stating that CUHK has until July 14,
21
2014 to file a response to the first supplemental complaint. Docket No. 202. For good cause, the Court
22
GRANTS CUHK’s request and ORDERS that CUHK’s response to the first supplemental complaint
23
must be filed by July 14, 2014. Because service has now been accepted by CUHK, the Court DENIES
24
AS MOOT plaintiff’s motion. Docket No. 201.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Dated: June 17, 2014
28
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge