Verinata Health, Inc. et al v. Sequenom, Inc. et al

Filing 203

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION REGARDING SERVICE #201 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/17/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 13 14 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION REGARDING SERVICE Plaintiffs, 11 12 No. C 12-00865 SI VERINATA HEALTH, INC., et al., v. SEQUENOM, INC., et al., Defendants. / 15 On May 20, 2014, plaintiffs filed a first supplemental complaint, adding Chinese University of 16 Hong Kong (“CUHK”) as a defendant. Docket No. 186. On June 12, 2014, plaintiffs filed a motion for 17 an order confirming service upon CUHK by publication or, in the alternative, for an order directing 18 CUHK’s counsel to accept service on behalf of CUHK. Docket No. 201. On June 16, 2014, CUHK 19 filed a response stating that it agrees to accept service of the first amended complaint and summons 20 effective June 12, 2014 provided that the Court issues an order stating that CUHK has until July 14, 21 2014 to file a response to the first supplemental complaint. Docket No. 202. For good cause, the Court 22 GRANTS CUHK’s request and ORDERS that CUHK’s response to the first supplemental complaint 23 must be filed by July 14, 2014. Because service has now been accepted by CUHK, the Court DENIES 24 AS MOOT plaintiff’s motion. Docket No. 201. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: June 17, 2014 28 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?