Verinata Health, Inc. et al v. Sequenom, Inc. et al
Filing
217
ORDER, Motions terminated: #216 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Verinata Health, Inc., The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Further Case Management Conference set for 7/11/14 is continued to 8/1/2014 03:00 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 7/9/14. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2014)
1 EDWARD R. REINES (Bar No. 135960)
edward.reines@weil.com
2 DEREK C. WALTER (Bar No. 246322)
derek.walter@weil.com
3
Silicon Valley Office
4 201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
5 Telephone: (650) 802-3000
Facsimile: (650) 802-3100
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants
7 VERINATA HEALTH, INC. and
8 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND
STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12 VERINATA HEALTH, INC. and THE BOARD
OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND
13 STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY,
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
CHINESE UNIVERSITY HONG KONG,
16
Defendant,
17
and
Case No. 12-cv-00865-SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE
FOR FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Judge:
Hon. Susan Illston
18 SEQUENOM, INC. and SEQUENOM CENTER
FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE, LLC,
19
Defendants/CounterclaimPlaintiffs,
20
v.
21
VERINATA HEALTH, INC. and THE
22 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND
STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY,
23
Counterclaim-Defendants,
24
and
25 ISIS INNOVATION LIMITED,
Nominal Counterclaim26
Defendant.
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No 3:12-cv-00865-SI
1
Verinata Health, Inc. (“Verinata”), The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior
2 University (“Stanford”), Sequenom, Inc. and Sequenom Center for Molecular Medicine LLC
3 (together “Sequenom”), and Chinese University of Hong Kong (“CUHK”) (collectively, the
4 “Parties”) by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
5
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to reschedule the Further Case Management
6 Conference set for July 11, 2014 at 3:00 PM to August 1, 2014 at 3:00 PM;
7
WHEREAS, the Court has confirmed that it is available for a Further Case Management
8 Conference on August 1, 2014 at 3:00 PM;
9
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through
10 their respective counsel, that the Further Case Management Conference set for July 11, 2014 at
11 3:00 PM be continued to August 1, 2014 at 3:00 PM.
12
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
13
14 Dated: July 8, 2014
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
15
By:
16
17
18
/s/ Derek C. Walter
Derek C. Walter
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Verinata Health, Inc. and The Board
of Trustees of the Leland Stanford
Junior University
19
20 Dated: July 8, 2014
KAYE SCHOLER LLP
21
By:
22
23
24
/s/ Michael Malecek
Michael Malecek
Attorneys for Defendants and
Counterclaim Plaintiffs
Sequenom, Inc. and Sequenom
Center for Molecular Medicine LLC
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
-2-
Case No 3:12-cv-00865-SI
1 Dated: July 8, 2014
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
2
3
By:
4
5
/s/ Robert F. McCauley
Robert F. McCauley
Attorneys for Defendant Chinese University
of Hong Kong
6
7
CERTIFICATION
8
9
I, Derek C. Walter, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to
10 file this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Michael
11 Malecek and Robert F. McCauley have concurred in this filing.
12
/s/ Derek C. Walter
Derek C. Walter
13
14
15 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17 Dated:
7/9/14
Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Court Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
-3-
Case No 3:12-cv-00865-SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?