Verinata Health, Inc. et al v. Sequenom, Inc. et al

Filing 360

ORDER RE: STATUS OF BIOGEN CASE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/25/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 VERINATA HEALTH, INC., et al., Case No. 12-cv-00865-SI Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER RE: STATUS OF BIOGEN CASE 9 10 SEQUENOM, INC., et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 On February 2, 2015, the Court denied cross-motions for summary judgment filed by 14 Sequenom and CHUK, and sua sponte stayed the action pending the Federal Circuit’s resolution 15 of the appeal from Biogen Idec MA, Inc. v. Japanese Found. for Cancer Research, No. CIV. 13- 16 13061-FDS, 2014 WL 2167677 (D. Mass. May 22, 2014), which found that the proper forum for 17 § 146 appeals from PTAB interference proceedings declared after September 16, 2012 is the 18 Federal Circuit, not a district court. Docket No. 345. This Court found that if the Federal Circuit 19 affirmed the Biogen ruling, it would likely deprive this Court of subject matter jurisdiction over 20 this case. On May 7, 2015, the Federal Circuit affirmed, thereby depriving this Court of subject 21 matter jurisdiction. Biogen MA, Inc. v. Japanese Found. for Cancer Research, 785 F.3d 648 (Fed. 22 Cir. 2015). 23 On May 8, 2015, CHUK filed a letter requesting that the Court dismiss this action with 24 prejudice. Docket No. 365. In a reply, Stanford urged the Court to postpone any action until the 25 time for initiating en banc review had expired, and that in any event, dismissal was an improper 26 remedy. Docket No. 357. 27 The Court hereby ORDERS the parties to file a joint statement no later than July 1, 2015 28 informing the Court as to the status of the Biogen case, and in particular, whether the time for 1 initiating en banc review has expired. In the event that the Federal Circuit will not rehear the case, 2 the Court intends to transfer this action to the Federal Circuit. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 25, 2015 7 ________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?