Verinata Health, Inc. et al v. Sequenom, Inc. et al
Filing
360
ORDER RE: STATUS OF BIOGEN CASE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/25/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
VERINATA HEALTH, INC., et al.,
Case No. 12-cv-00865-SI
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
ORDER RE: STATUS OF BIOGEN
CASE
9
10
SEQUENOM, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
On February 2, 2015, the Court denied cross-motions for summary judgment filed by
14
Sequenom and CHUK, and sua sponte stayed the action pending the Federal Circuit’s resolution
15
of the appeal from Biogen Idec MA, Inc. v. Japanese Found. for Cancer Research, No. CIV. 13-
16
13061-FDS, 2014 WL 2167677 (D. Mass. May 22, 2014), which found that the proper forum for
17
§ 146 appeals from PTAB interference proceedings declared after September 16, 2012 is the
18
Federal Circuit, not a district court. Docket No. 345. This Court found that if the Federal Circuit
19
affirmed the Biogen ruling, it would likely deprive this Court of subject matter jurisdiction over
20
this case. On May 7, 2015, the Federal Circuit affirmed, thereby depriving this Court of subject
21
matter jurisdiction. Biogen MA, Inc. v. Japanese Found. for Cancer Research, 785 F.3d 648 (Fed.
22
Cir. 2015).
23
On May 8, 2015, CHUK filed a letter requesting that the Court dismiss this action with
24
prejudice. Docket No. 365. In a reply, Stanford urged the Court to postpone any action until the
25
time for initiating en banc review had expired, and that in any event, dismissal was an improper
26
remedy. Docket No. 357.
27
The Court hereby ORDERS the parties to file a joint statement no later than July 1, 2015
28
informing the Court as to the status of the Biogen case, and in particular, whether the time for
1
initiating en banc review has expired. In the event that the Federal Circuit will not rehear the case,
2
the Court intends to transfer this action to the Federal Circuit.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 25, 2015
7
________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?