Filing 33

ORDER Re: Show Cause hearing/issuance of Warrant. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 5/6/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2013)

Download PDF
1 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney 2 THOMAS MOORE (ALBN 4305-O78T) 3 Chief, Tax Division 4 CHARLES PARKER Special Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055 5 San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7149 6 Facsimile: (415) 436-7009 Email: charles.parker@usdoj.gov 7 8 Attorneys for the United States of America 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Petitioners, Case No. CV 12-0892 SI [Proposed] ORDER v. 14 15 BARBARA A. SANCEN, 16 Respondent. 17 18 Good cause having been shown by the United States upon its Second Motion for Order Finding 19 Respondent in Contempt, Respondent Barbara Sancen’s (Respondent) failure to appear before the Court 20 on May 2, 2013, and Respondent’s failure to comply with the Court’s September 21, 2012, Order (Dkt. 21 No. 16), it is hereby 22 ORDERED that the clerk of the Court shall issue a bench warrant for the arrest of Respondent 23 Barbara A. Sancen (“Respondent”) pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1826(a). 24 It is FURTHER ORDERED that after Respondent is taken into custody she shall appear before 25 this Court and then and there show cause, if any, why she should not be held in contempt for her 26 continued and repeated failure to comply with the Order of this Court. 27 28 1 It is FURTHER ORDERED that the United States will provide Respondent an opportunity to 2 comply with the Internal Revenue Service Summons at issue in this matter (Dkt. No. 1) as soon as is 3 reasonably permissible after Respondent is taken into custody. 4 ORDERED this 6th day of May, 2013, at San Francisco, California. 5 6 7 SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Proposed Order C-12-0892-SI 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?