Jefferson v. City of Fremont et al

Filing 61

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 60 To Extend Deadline to Complete Early Neutral Evaluation filed by Joe Grech, Fremont Tennis Center, Kelly King, Annabelle Holland, City of Fremont, Jeff Gonce. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/18/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876 Ilana Kohn, State Bar No. 203389 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT The Waterfront Building 2749 Hyde Street San Francisco, California 94109 Telephone: (415) 353-0999 Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 Harvey E. Levine, Esq., State Bar No. 61880 City Attorney City of Fremont 3300 Capitol Avenue PO Box 5006 Fremont, CA 94537-5006 Telephone: (510) 284-4030 Facsimile: (610) 284-4031 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF FREMONT, FREMONT TENNIS CENTER, JEFF GONCE, JOE GRECH, ANNABELLE HOLLAND and KELLY KING 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 14 15 WALTER JEFFERSON, 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. 3:12-cv-00926 EMC Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 THE CITY OF FREMONT, FREMONT TENNIS CENTER, JEFF GONCE, JOE GRECH, ANNABELLE HOLLAND, KELLY KING and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, 19 20 21 STIPULATION OF COUNSEL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION Hon. Edward M. Chen Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION OF COUNSEL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION 1 Defendants City of Fremont, a municipal public entity on behalf of itself and the Fremont Tennis 2 Center, Jeff Gonce, Joe Grech, Annabelle Holland, and Kelly King, and Plaintiff Walter Jefferson hereby 3 submit the following Stipulation and Proposed Order extending time to complete Early Neutral 4 Evaluation. 5 WHEREAS on October 12, 2012, the parties appeared for hearing on Defendants’ Motion to 6 Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and for case management. The Court denied defendants’ 7 motion to dismiss as moot because plaintiff’s counsel told the Court that plaintiff will file a second 8 amended complaint to address the issues raised in the motion to dismiss. During the case management 9 conference, Judge Chen agreed with defense counsel that the parties would benefit and it may be a more 10 efficient use of the Court’s time for the parties to conduct early neutral evaluation. It was also suggested 11 by defense counsel that before ENE took place, plaintiff should provide a list of witnesses and an offer of 12 proof. 13 14 WHEREAS the Court then referred the parties to Early Neutral Evaluation to be completed on or before December 11, 2012; 15 WHEREAS the Court also gave plaintiff ninety (90) days to file an amended complaint, with the 16 assumption that ENE would be completed before that date. The Court also indicated it would consider a 17 request to extend time to complete the above schedule given the holiday schedules, travel plans, and 18 litigation schedules of the parties. 19 20 WHEREAS on Monday, November 19, 2012, plaintiff provided defendants with an Informal (Partial) List of Potential Witnesses; 21 WHEREAS the defendants needed more time to review and meet and confer with plaintiff’s 22 counsel on the offer of proof and additional limited necessary discovery so that the ENE would be 23 worthwhile and productive for all parties; 24 25 WHEREAS the Court approved the parties’ stipulation to extend the deadline to complete the ENE and the parties agreed to participate in ENE on February 13, 2013. 26 WHEREAS on January 14, 2013, plaintiff’s counsel informed defense counsel that new evidence 27 had come to the attention of plaintiff, which required additional time to investigate in order for plaintiff 28 to participate in the ENE scheduled for February 13, 2013. The parties and ENE evaluator agreed to 2 STIPULATION OF COUNSEL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION 1 schedule the ENE for April 29, 2013 and the Court approved the parties’ stipulation to extend the time to 2 complete ENE; 3 WHEREAS on February 8, 2013, plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint; 4 WHEREAS on February 28, 2013, the ENE Evaluator notified all parties that she had to be out of 5 town for business on April 29, 2013 and proposed to reschedule the ENE during the week of April 22, 6 2013, but plaintiff’s counsel advised that she was in trial that week; 7 WHEREAS all parties and the Evaluator have agreed to reschedule the ENE for June 4, 2013. 8 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 9 The time to complete Early Neutral Evaluation shall be extended to June 4, 2013. 10 SO STIPULATED. 11 12 Dated: April 11, 2013 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 13 14 By: /s/ Gregory M. Fox Ilana Kohn Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF FREMONT, FREMONT TENNIS CENTER, JEFF GONCE, JOE GRECH, ANNABELLE HOLLAND and KELLY KING 15 16 17 18 19 20 Dated: April 11, 2013 MORGAN LOGAN LAW GROUP 21 22 23 24 By: /s/ Angela L. Morgan Attorney for Plaintiff WALTER JEFFERSON 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION OF COUNSEL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CERTIFICATE OF CONCURRENCE 1 2 I, Ilana Kohn, declare: 3 Pursuant to Local Rule No. 5-1(i)(3) I have obtained the concurrence of all other parties in the 4 5 6 filing of this document, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the documents. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is executed at San Francisco, California, on April 16, 2012. 7 /s/____________________ ILANA KOHN, Esq. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ORDER Pursuant to the above Stipulation of the parties by and through their respective counsel of record, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The time to complete Early Neutral Evaluation shall be extended to June 4, 2013. 16 S 21 n M. Che LI ER A H 24 RT 23 NO 22 dward Judge E R NIA 20 _________________________________________ D EDWARD M. CHEN RDERE S SO O COURT JUDGE IT I UNITED STATES DISTRICT FO 19 18 Dated: April ___, 2013 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 17 N F D IS T IC T O R C 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION OF COUNSEL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?