Perez v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al
Filing
32
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AS AGAINST SPECIFIED DEFENDANTS AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 31 Notice (Other), filed by Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc., Homeward Residential, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 9, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
PETRA PEREZ,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
No. C 12-00932 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
AS AGAINST SPECIFIED
DEFENDANTS AND ORDER
TO SHOW CAUSE
AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE
SERVICING, INC., MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM,
INC., T.D. SERVICE COMPANY, and DOES
1–50, INCLUSIVE,
Defendants.
/
By order dated April 23, 2012, defendants American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., and
19
Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.’s motion to dismiss was granted. The order
20
concluded that plaintiff Petra Perez, who is represented by counsel, insufficiently pleaded each
21
alleged claim for relief. One claim was dismissed without leave to amend. All others were
22
dismissed with leave to file a motion for leave to amend the complaint by May 7, 2012. Plaintiff
23
did not seek leave to amend. Moreover, pursuant to the case management order, the deadline to
24
add new parties or make pleading amendments was June 29, 2012. On July 2, 2012, defendants
25
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (who filed a notice indicating effective May 29, 2012,
26
they “officially become Homeward Residential, Inc.”), and Mortgage Electronic Registration
27
System, Inc., filed a notice of plaintiff’s failure to file a motion for leave to file an amended
28
complaint and requested dismissal of this action with prejudice. All claims in the operative
complaint have been dismissed against defendants American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.,
1
and Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc., and plaintiff has failed to timely amend.
2
Thus, the action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as against defendants American Home Mortgage
3
Servicing, Inc. (now “Homeward Residential, Inc.”), and Mortgage Electronic Registration
4
System, Inc.
5
Defendant T.D. Service Company is the sole remaining defendant. Defendant T.D.
6
Service Company filed a declaration of non-monetary status on February 7, 2012, prior to
7
removal of this action to federal court. This Court has held that Section 2924l declarations are
8
generally not valid in federal court proceedings. See Kennedy v. PLM Lender Services, Inc., No.
9
10-CV-04942, 2012 WL 1038632, at *5–6 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2012) (Alsup, J.). However,
where the parties have stipulated to non-monetary status as to a particular defendant, this Court
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
has upheld the agreement between the parties and treated said defendant as a nominal defendant.
12
Avila v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 12-CV-01237, Dkt. No. 22 (N.D. Cal. May 21, 2012)
13
(Alsup, J).
14
By JULY 23, 2012, if no stipulation of non-monetary status has been filed as to defendant
15
T.D. Service Company, plaintiff must show cause why the reasons for dismissing the action,
16
stated in the dismissal order dated April 23, 2012, do not also apply to the claims alleged against
17
defendant T.D. Service Company, and therefore why the action should not be dismissed against
18
T.D. Service Company.
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
Dated: July 9, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?