Perez v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al

Filing 32

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AS AGAINST SPECIFIED DEFENDANTS AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 31 Notice (Other), filed by Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc., Homeward Residential, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 9, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 PETRA PEREZ, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 No. C 12-00932 WHA Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AS AGAINST SPECIFIED DEFENDANTS AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC., T.D. SERVICE COMPANY, and DOES 1–50, INCLUSIVE, Defendants. / By order dated April 23, 2012, defendants American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., and 19 Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.’s motion to dismiss was granted. The order 20 concluded that plaintiff Petra Perez, who is represented by counsel, insufficiently pleaded each 21 alleged claim for relief. One claim was dismissed without leave to amend. All others were 22 dismissed with leave to file a motion for leave to amend the complaint by May 7, 2012. Plaintiff 23 did not seek leave to amend. Moreover, pursuant to the case management order, the deadline to 24 add new parties or make pleading amendments was June 29, 2012. On July 2, 2012, defendants 25 American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (who filed a notice indicating effective May 29, 2012, 26 they “officially become Homeward Residential, Inc.”), and Mortgage Electronic Registration 27 System, Inc., filed a notice of plaintiff’s failure to file a motion for leave to file an amended 28 complaint and requested dismissal of this action with prejudice. All claims in the operative complaint have been dismissed against defendants American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., 1 and Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc., and plaintiff has failed to timely amend. 2 Thus, the action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as against defendants American Home Mortgage 3 Servicing, Inc. (now “Homeward Residential, Inc.”), and Mortgage Electronic Registration 4 System, Inc. 5 Defendant T.D. Service Company is the sole remaining defendant. Defendant T.D. 6 Service Company filed a declaration of non-monetary status on February 7, 2012, prior to 7 removal of this action to federal court. This Court has held that Section 2924l declarations are 8 generally not valid in federal court proceedings. See Kennedy v. PLM Lender Services, Inc., No. 9 10-CV-04942, 2012 WL 1038632, at *5–6 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2012) (Alsup, J.). However, where the parties have stipulated to non-monetary status as to a particular defendant, this Court 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 has upheld the agreement between the parties and treated said defendant as a nominal defendant. 12 Avila v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 12-CV-01237, Dkt. No. 22 (N.D. Cal. May 21, 2012) 13 (Alsup, J). 14 By JULY 23, 2012, if no stipulation of non-monetary status has been filed as to defendant 15 T.D. Service Company, plaintiff must show cause why the reasons for dismissing the action, 16 stated in the dismissal order dated April 23, 2012, do not also apply to the claims alleged against 17 defendant T.D. Service Company, and therefore why the action should not be dismissed against 18 T.D. Service Company. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: July 9, 2012. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?