Retiree Support Group of Contra Costa County v. Contra Costa County

Filing 112

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 111 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation Extending Case Deadlines And [Proposed] Order filed by Contra Costa County. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 20, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2015)

1 LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON, P.C.
JEFFREY LEWIS, SBN 066587
2 [e-mail]
ANDREW LAH, SBN 234580
3 [e-mail]
DARIN RANAHAN, SBN 273532
4 [e-mail]
MICHAEL CAESAR, SBN 280548
5 [e-mail]
6 LINDA LAM, SBN 301461
[e-mail]
th
7 476 9 Street
Oakland, CA 94607
[phone]
8 Telephone:
Facsimile:
[phone]
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
10 RETIREE SUPPORT GROUP OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
11 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
RAYMOND F. LYNCH, SBN 119065
12 [e-mail]
LAWRENCE M. CIRELLI, SBN 114710
13 [e-mail]
STEPHEN B. PECK, SBN 72214
14 [e-mail]
MATTHEW JOSEPH PECK, SBN 287934
15 [e-mail]
425 Market Street, 26th Floor
16 San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
[phone]
17 Facsimile:
18 Attorneys for Defendant
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
19
20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

21

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

22
23 RETIREE SUPPORT GROUP OF CONTRA
COSTA COUNTY,
24
Plaintiff,
25
v.
26
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,
27
Defendant.
28

CASE NO. C 12-00944 JST
STIPULATION EXTENDING CASE
DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar

10908830.2

C 12-00944 JST
STIPULATION EXTENDING CASE DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

1. The current Scheduling Orders provide the indicated case deadlines (Dkts. 91 and 97);

2

2. The parties have engaged in substantial discovery and there still remains a significant

3 amount of discovery to be completed before this case is ready for trial;
4

3. Plaintiff Retiree Support Group of Contra Costa County ("RSG") and Defendant Contra

5 Costa County (the "County") (collectively the "Parties") are currently exploring alternative
6 dispute resolution ("ADR") options in advance of the ADR conference scheduled for March 10,
7 2015;
8

4. The Parties wish to postpone for two weeks imminent discovery deadlines to allow the

9 Parties additional time to explore engaging in an ADR process which would be complex and time
10 consuming given the nature of this case;
11

5. Depending on further discussions, after the two week continuance, the Parties may

12 request an additional continuance of case deadlines and the trial date for approximately six months
13 to allow the Parties additional time to explore settlement through an alternative dispute resolution
14 procedure.;
15

The Parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree

16 that there is good cause to continue all case deadlines as follows pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
17 Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10 and request the Court approve and so order:
18
19
20
21
22

Event

Deadline

Fact discovery cut-off

3/20/15 to 4/3/15

Expert disclosures

2/23/15 to 3/9/15

Expert rebuttal

3/12/15 to 3/26/15

Expert discovery cut-off

4/9/15 to 4/23/15

23 / / /
24 / / /
25 / / /
26 / / /
27

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

28
10908830.2

-2STIPULATION EXTENDING CASE DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

C 12-00944 JST

1 DATED: February 18, 2015

LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER &
JACKSON, P.C.

2
3

/s/ Andrew Lah
By:

4

ANDREW LAH
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RETIREE SUPPORT GROUP OF CONTRA
COSTA COUNTY

5
6
7 DATED: February 18, 2015

HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

8

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14 Dated: February ____, 2015
20

nS
J u d ge J o

ER

H

18

RT

17

United States District Court Judge

NO

16

DERED
SO OR
IT IS
HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR

19

. Ti ga r

A

15

UNIT
ED

13

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

12

R NIA

10

/s/ Raymond F. Lynch
RAYMOND F. LYNCH
Attorneys for Defendant
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

FO

By:

LI

9

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10908830.2

-3STIPULATION EXTENDING CASE DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

C 12-00944 JST

1

SIGNATURES UNDER GENERAL ORDER NO. 45

2 Pursuant to General Order No. 45 of the United States District Court, Northern District of
3 California, I, Raymond F. Lynch—the ECF User whose User ID and Password are used in the
4 filing of this document—hereby attests that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been
5 obtained from each of the other signatories to this document.
6
/s/ Raymond F. Lynch
Raymond F. Lynch

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10908830.2

-4STIPULATION EXTENDING CASE DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

C 12-00944 JST