Jackson v. County Of Monterey et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/24/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

CHARLES J. McKEE (SBN 152458)
County Counsel
WILLIAM M. LITT (SBN 166614)
Deputy County Counsel
JUAN P. RODRIGUEZ (SBN 252306)
Deputy County Counsel
OFFICE OF THE MONTEREY COUNTY COUNSEL
168 W. Alisal Street, Third Floor
Salinas, CA 93901-2439
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF MONTEREY,
JOSH BOWLING & PHIL HICKENBOTTOM

12

Michael S. Biggs, Esq. (SBN 237640)
Law Offices of Michael S. Biggs
55 Main Street
Tiburon, CA 94920
[phone] Telephone
(415) 789- 5923 Facsimile
Email: Michael S. Biggs [e-mail]

13

Attorney for Plaintiff, KATHLEEN JACKSON

10
11

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18

KATHLEEN JACKSON,

19

Plaintiff,

20
21
22

Case No: 3:12-CV-00945-RS

vs.
COUNTY OF MONTEREY, JOSH
BOWLING, PHIL HICKENBOTTOM
and DOES ONE through 20,

23

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Defendants.

24
25
26
27

TO:

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA:

/////

28

1
Jackson v. County of Monterey, et al.
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Further Extending Time to Respond to the First Amended Complaint

CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00945-PSG

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff and Defendants, through their attorneys

2

of record, that the time to respond to the First Amended Complaint, which is currently due July

3

23, 2012, will be extended for three weeks from July 23, 2012, to Monday, August 20, 2012, to

4

allow the parties to engage in further informal discovery and possible settlement negotiations.

5
6

Dated: July 23, 2012

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL S. BIGGS

7
By:
8

/s/Michael S. Biggs
MICHAEL S. BIGGS, ESQ.
Attorney for Plaintiff KATHLEEN JACKSON

9
10
11

Dated: July 23, 2012

CHARLES J. McKEE, COUNTY COUNSEL

12
By:

13
14
15

/s/ William M. Litt
WILLIAM M. LITT
Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF
MONTEREY, JOSH BOWLING & PHIL
HICKENBOTTOM

16
17

[PROPOSED] ORDER

18

x


The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

19



The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21
22
23

Dated:

7/24/12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28

2
Jackson v. County of Monterey, et al.
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Further Extending Time to Respond to the First Amended Complaint

CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00945-PSG