Isaacs et al v. Countrywide Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 48

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING Show Cause Response due by 7/20/2012.. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 29, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 No. C 12-00951 WHA THEODORE ISAACS and NORMA ISAACS, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING v. COUNTRYWIDE BANK N.A., original mortgage lender, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, a mortgage servicer, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, a nominee/beneficiary, NORTH AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, Title Company, THE BANK OF NEW YORK, and RECON TRUST COMPANY, mortgage trustee, Defendants. / 19 20 On June 11, 2012, defendants Countrywide Bank, N.A., Countrywide Home Loans 21 Servicing LP, (erroneously sued as “Countrywide Home Loans Servicing” and “Country Wide 22 Home Loans Servicing”), The Bank of New York Mellon (erroneously sued as “The Bank of 23 New York”), and Recontrust Company, N.A. (erroneously sued as “Recon Trust Company”), 24 filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, 25 plaintiffs’ opposition or statement of non-opposition thereto was due June 25, 2012. None was 26 received. Plaintiffs Theodore Isaacs and Norma Isaacs are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE 27 why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiffs must file a written 28 1 response to this order by JULY 20, 2012. If no response is filed, defendants’ motion to dismiss 2 may be granted. The hearing set for July 26, 2012, is hereby VACATED. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: June 29, 2012. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?