Isaacs et al v. Countrywide Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
48
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING Show Cause Response due by 7/20/2012.. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 29, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
No. C 12-00951 WHA
THEODORE ISAACS and NORMA ISAACS,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiffs,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
AND VACATING HEARING
v.
COUNTRYWIDE BANK N.A., original
mortgage lender, COUNTRYWIDE HOME
LOANS SERVICING, a mortgage servicer,
COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS
SERVICING, a nominee/beneficiary, NORTH
AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, Title
Company, THE BANK OF NEW YORK, and
RECON TRUST COMPANY, mortgage trustee,
Defendants.
/
19
20
On June 11, 2012, defendants Countrywide Bank, N.A., Countrywide Home Loans
21
Servicing LP, (erroneously sued as “Countrywide Home Loans Servicing” and “Country Wide
22
Home Loans Servicing”), The Bank of New York Mellon (erroneously sued as “The Bank of
23
New York”), and Recontrust Company, N.A. (erroneously sued as “Recon Trust Company”),
24
filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3,
25
plaintiffs’ opposition or statement of non-opposition thereto was due June 25, 2012. None was
26
received. Plaintiffs Theodore Isaacs and Norma Isaacs are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE
27
why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiffs must file a written
28
1
response to this order by JULY 20, 2012. If no response is filed, defendants’ motion to dismiss
2
may be granted. The hearing set for July 26, 2012, is hereby VACATED.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: June 29, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?