Sandigo v. Sayre et al

Filing 29

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Dispositive Motion due by 7/17/2014. Plaintiff's response to be filed 45 days after the filing of the motion. Defendant's reply, if any, to be filed 15 days after the filing of the opposition. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/02/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

DANIEL S. SANDIGO,

Case No. 12-cv-00980-WHO (PR)

Plaintiff,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

v.

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE

12
13

MICHAEL C. SAYRE, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15
16

The Court sets the following briefing schedule. On July 17, 2014, defendants shall

17

file a dispositive motion, or notice regarding such motion, in response to the complaint,

18

and in conformity with the second order of service (Docket No. 7). Plaintiff Sandigo's

19

opposition to such motion, if any, shall be filed within forty-five days after defendants

20

have filed their motion. Defendants shall file a reply, if any, within fifteen days of the

21

opposition being filed. Defendants are to adhere to the notice provisions detailed in

22

Sections 2.a and 10 of the second order of service (Docket No. 7). The motion shall be

23

deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the

24

motion unless the Court so orders at a later date.

25

All communications by Sandigo with the Court must be served on defendants, or

26

defendants’ counsel once counsel has been designated, by mailing a true copy of the

27

document to defendants or defendants’ counsel.

28

1

Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

2

No further court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) or Local Rule 16-1

3

is required before the parties may conduct discovery.

4

It is Sandigo's responsibility to prosecute this case. He must keep the court

5

informed of any change of address and must comply with the Court’s orders in a timely

6

fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute

7

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Extensions of time must be filed no later than the deadline sought to be extended
and must be accompanied by a showing of good cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 2, 2014
_________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL S SANDIGO,

Case Number: CV12-00980 WHO

Plaintiff,

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

v.
MICHAEL C SAYRE et al,
Defendant.

/

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on April 2, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy of the attached, by placing said copy in
a postage paid envelope addressed to the person hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in
the U.S. Mail.

Daniel S. Sandigo K-07935
Pelican Bay State Prison D10-201
P.O. Box 7500
Crescent City, CA 95532

Dated: April 2, 2014
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jean Davis, Deputy Clerk