Sandigo v. Sayre et al

Filing 29

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Dispositive Motion due by 7/17/2014. Plaintiff's response to be filed 45 days after the filing of the motion. Defendant's reply, if any, to be filed 15 days after the filing of the opposition. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/02/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DANIEL S. SANDIGO, Case No. 12-cv-00980-WHO (PR) Plaintiff, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California v. ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 12 13 MICHAEL C. SAYRE, et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 The Court sets the following briefing schedule. On July 17, 2014, defendants shall 17 file a dispositive motion, or notice regarding such motion, in response to the complaint, 18 and in conformity with the second order of service (Docket No. 7). Plaintiff Sandigo's 19 opposition to such motion, if any, shall be filed within forty-five days after defendants 20 have filed their motion. Defendants shall file a reply, if any, within fifteen days of the 21 opposition being filed. Defendants are to adhere to the notice provisions detailed in 22 Sections 2.a and 10 of the second order of service (Docket No. 7). The motion shall be 23 deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the 24 motion unless the Court so orders at a later date. 25 All communications by Sandigo with the Court must be served on defendants, or 26 defendants’ counsel once counsel has been designated, by mailing a true copy of the 27 document to defendants or defendants’ counsel. 28 1 Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2 No further court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) or Local Rule 16-1 3 is required before the parties may conduct discovery. 4 It is Sandigo's responsibility to prosecute this case. He must keep the court 5 informed of any change of address and must comply with the Court’s orders in a timely 6 fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute 7 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Extensions of time must be filed no later than the deadline sought to be extended and must be accompanied by a showing of good cause. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 2, 2014 _________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANIEL S SANDIGO, Case Number: CV12-00980 WHO Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. MICHAEL C SAYRE et al, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on April 2, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy of the attached, by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail. Daniel S. Sandigo K-07935 Pelican Bay State Prison D10-201 P.O. Box 7500 Crescent City, CA 95532 Dated: April 2, 2014 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jean Davis, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?