Wright et al v. Adventures Rolling Cross Country, Inc. et al

Filing 74

STIPULATION AND ORDER i>REGARDING CONTINUING DEADLINES AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE UNTIL AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PRIVATE MEDIATION filed by Michelle Trame, Peter Wright, Motions terminated: 52 MOTION to Strike and 53 Admin istrative Motion to File Under Seal PORTIONS OF MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS filed by Michelle Trame. Case Management Statement due by 8/24/2012. Case Management Conference set for 8/31/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/28/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 BRYAN SCHWARTZ LAW BRYAN SCHWARTZ (SBN 209903) HILLARY J. BENHAM-BAKER (SBN 265019) 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1550 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 444-9300 Facsimile: (510) 444-9301 Email: bryan@bryanschwartzlaw.com Email: hillary@bryanschwartzlaw.com RUDY, EXELROD, ZIEFF & LOWE, L.L.P. DAVID A. LOWE (SBN: 178811) JOHN T. MULLAN (SBN 221149) 351 California Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 434-9800 Facsimile: (415) 434-0513 Email: dal@rezlaw.com Email: jtm@rezlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 18 19 PETER WRIGHT and MICHELLE TRAME, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiffs, 20 21 22 23 24 25 v. ADVENTURES ROLLING CROSS COUNTRY, Inc., d/b/a ADVENTURES CROSS COUNTRY (ARCC), a California Corporation, SCOTT VON ESCHEN, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Case No. 4:12-cv-00982-EMC STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUING DEADLINES AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE UNTIL AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PRIVATE MEDIATION ; ORDER Courtroom 5, 17th Floor Honorable Edward M. Chen Defendants. 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE CONTINUING DEADLINES AND CMC Case No. 4:12-cv-00982-EMC 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective 2 attorneys of record that, in light of the parties’ scheduled private mediation with Barry Winograd on 3 July 19, 2012, and in the interest of preserving resources pending the completion of this private 4 mediation session, that the following deadlines and hearings in this matter be set as follows: 5 1. The case management conference in this matter, currently set for July 19, 2012, be 6 continued to a date after August 1, 2012; 7 8 9 10 11 2. Plaintiffs’ deadline for responding to Defendants’ Amended Counterclaims shall be September 12, 2012; 3. Plaintiffs’ deadline for responding to Defendants’ Amended Answer shall be September 12, 2012. 12 13 Dated: June 26, 2012 14 15 By: /s/ Rocky C. Tsai 16 17 Rocky C. Tsai 18 Attorneys for Defendants ADVENTURES CROSS-COUNTRY SCOTT VON ESCHEN 19 20 Dated: June 26, 2012 21 22 By: 23 /s/ Hillary Benham-Baker ___ Hillary Benham-Baker 24 Attorneys for Plaintiffs PETER WRIGHT MICHELLE TRAME 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION RE CONTINUING DEADLINES AND CMC Case No. 4:12-cv-00982-EMC ORDER 1 2 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties’ Stipulation, 3 above, is approved and adopted as the Order of this Court, as follows: 4 5 6 7 1. The case management conference in this matter, currently set for July 19, 2012, is hereby at 9:00 a.m. August 24 August 31 continued to ______________, 2012./ A joint case management statement is due by ___________, 2012; 8 9 2. Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendants’ Amended Counterclaims shall on or before September 12, 2012; 10 3. Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendants’ Amended Answer on or before September 12, 11 12 2012. 13 28 Dated: June ___ , 2012 19 RT 21 OO IT IS S IFIED S MOD A dwar Judge E ER 23 A H 22 en d M. Ch NO 20 Edward Chen D UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE RDERE R NIA 18 UNIT ED 17 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 16 FO 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiffs' motion to strike (Docket #52) set for 7/19/12 is vacated. LI 14 N D IS T IC T R OF C 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. CV 12-00982 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?