Wright et al v. Adventures Rolling Cross Country, Inc. et al
Filing
86
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 81 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Adventures Rolling Cross Country, Inc., Scott Von Eschen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/29/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
Case No. 4:12-cv-00982-EMC
PETER WRIGHT and MICHELLE TRAME,
individually, on behalf of all others similarly
situated, and on behalf of the general public,
14
15
[PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING
WITHDRAWAL OF ROPES & GRAY
LLP AS COUNSEL FOR
DEFENDANTS
Plaintiffs,
v.
16
17
18
19
20
[Civil L.R. 11-5]
ADVENTURES ROLLING CROSS
COUNTRY, Inc., d/b/a ADVENTURES
CROSS COUNTRY (ARCC), a California
Corporation, SCOTT VON ESCHEN, and
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
Courtroom 5, 17th Floor
HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
PROPOSED ORDER RE WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL
Case No. 4:12-cv-00982-EMC
1
2
3
Having considered the Notice of Withdrawal of Ropes & Gray LLP as counsel for
Defendants Adventures Rolling Cross Country, Inc. and Scott von Eschen (collectively,
“Defendants”), and the Notice of Appearance of Curiale, Hirschfeld & Kramer LLP as substitute
4
counsel for Defendants, and good cause appearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-5,
5
counsel for Defendants.
S
10
11
hen
______________________________
rd M. C
ge Edwa
Jud
Honorable Edward M. Chen
8/29/12
Dated: _______________________
NO
12
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
RT
E
H
13
R Court Judge
U.S. District N
14
R NIA
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FO
UNIT
ED
9
RT
U
O
8
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
LI
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Ropes & Gray LLP is hereby permitted to withdraw as
A
6
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PROPOSED ORDER RE WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL
Case No. 4:12-cv-00982-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?