Wright et al v. Adventures Rolling Cross Country, Inc. et al

Filing 86

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 81 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Adventures Rolling Cross Country, Inc., Scott Von Eschen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/29/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 Case No. 4:12-cv-00982-EMC PETER WRIGHT and MICHELLE TRAME, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, 14 15 [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING WITHDRAWAL OF ROPES & GRAY LLP AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS Plaintiffs, v. 16 17 18 19 20 [Civil L.R. 11-5] ADVENTURES ROLLING CROSS COUNTRY, Inc., d/b/a ADVENTURES CROSS COUNTRY (ARCC), a California Corporation, SCOTT VON ESCHEN, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Courtroom 5, 17th Floor HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 PROPOSED ORDER RE WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL Case No. 4:12-cv-00982-EMC 1 2 3 Having considered the Notice of Withdrawal of Ropes & Gray LLP as counsel for Defendants Adventures Rolling Cross Country, Inc. and Scott von Eschen (collectively, “Defendants”), and the Notice of Appearance of Curiale, Hirschfeld & Kramer LLP as substitute 4 counsel for Defendants, and good cause appearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-5, 5 counsel for Defendants. S 10 11 hen ______________________________ rd M. C ge Edwa Jud Honorable Edward M. Chen 8/29/12 Dated: _______________________ NO 12 DERED O OR IT IS S RT E H 13 R Court Judge U.S. District N 14 R NIA IT IS SO ORDERED. FO UNIT ED 9 RT U O 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA LI 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Ropes & Gray LLP is hereby permitted to withdraw as A 6 F D IS T IC T O R C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 PROPOSED ORDER RE WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL Case No. 4:12-cv-00982-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?