Wright et al v. Adventures Rolling Cross Country, Inc. et al
Filing
92
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 90 for Dismissal of Counterclaims filed by Adventures Rolling Cross Country, Inc., Scott Von Eschen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/26/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT
12
SANTA MO NI CA
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
15
PETER WRIGHT and MICHELLE
TRAME, individually, on behalf of all
others similarly situated, and on behalf of
the general public,
16
17
18
19
20
Case No. 3:12-cv-00982-EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
COUNTERCLAIMS
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ADVENTURES ROLLING CROSS
COUNTRY, INC., dba ADVENTURES
CROSS COUNTRY (ARCC), a California
Corporation, SCOTT VON ESCHEN, and
DOES 1 through 50 inclusive,
21
Honorable Edward M. Chen
Courtroom 5, 17th Floor
Defendants.
22
23
AND RELATED COUNTER ACTION
24
25
26
27
28
///
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIP FOR DISMISSAL OF COUNTERCLAIMS
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00982-EMC
4823-7578-5489
1
Having read and considered Counterclaimant ADVENTURES ROLLING CROSS
2
COUNTRY, INC. dba ADVENTURES CROSS COUNTY (ARCC) and Counter-Defendants
3
PETER WRIGHT and MICHELLE TRAME’s Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Counterclaims,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that ARCC’s counterclaims (Docket Nos. 44 and 70) are hereby
5
dismissed with prejudice in their entirety pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(c).
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORD
T IS SO
S
By:
I
FO
ER
LI
SANTA MO NI CA
14
HON. EDWARD M. CHEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
hen
rd M. C
ge Edwa
Jud
H
13
RT
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
12
NO
H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP
11
ERED
A
10
26
Dated: October _____, 2012
UNIT
ED
9
RT
U
O
8
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
7
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIP FOR DISMISSAL OF COUNTERCLAIMS
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00982-EMC
4823-7578-5489
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?