Wright et al v. Adventures Rolling Cross Country, Inc. et al

Filing 92

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 90 for Dismissal of Counterclaims filed by Adventures Rolling Cross Country, Inc., Scott Von Eschen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/26/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT 12 SANTA MO NI CA ATTO RNEY S AT LAW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 PETER WRIGHT and MICHELLE TRAME, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, 16 17 18 19 20 Case No. 3:12-cv-00982-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF COUNTERCLAIMS Plaintiffs, vs. ADVENTURES ROLLING CROSS COUNTRY, INC., dba ADVENTURES CROSS COUNTRY (ARCC), a California Corporation, SCOTT VON ESCHEN, and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive, 21 Honorable Edward M. Chen Courtroom 5, 17th Floor Defendants. 22 23 AND RELATED COUNTER ACTION 24 25 26 27 28 /// [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIP FOR DISMISSAL OF COUNTERCLAIMS CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00982-EMC 4823-7578-5489 1 Having read and considered Counterclaimant ADVENTURES ROLLING CROSS 2 COUNTRY, INC. dba ADVENTURES CROSS COUNTY (ARCC) and Counter-Defendants 3 PETER WRIGHT and MICHELLE TRAME’s Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Counterclaims, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that ARCC’s counterclaims (Docket Nos. 44 and 70) are hereby 5 dismissed with prejudice in their entirety pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(c). 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. ORD T IS SO S By: I FO ER LI SANTA MO NI CA 14 HON. EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT hen rd M. C ge Edwa Jud H 13 RT ATTO RNEY S AT LAW 12 NO H IRSCHFELD K RAEMER LLP 11 ERED A 10 26 Dated: October _____, 2012 UNIT ED 9 RT U O 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 7 N F D IS T IC T O R C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIP FOR DISMISSAL OF COUNTERCLAIMS CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00982-EMC 4823-7578-5489

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?