Peterson et al v. Honig

Filing 43

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT; VACATING EXISTING DATES 39 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/23/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

VICTORIA PETERSON,

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

No. C 12-00988 SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE
AMENDED COMPLAINT; VACATING
EXISTING DATES

v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
et al.
Defendants.

13

/

14
On October 30, 2012,the Court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim with
15
leave to amend her complaint no later than November 19, 2012. On November 19, 2012, plaintiff filed
16
a request for additional time to file her amended complaint due to health concerns. During the pendency
17
of that request, plaintiff filed a second request for additional time due to her need prepare for the
18
February 2013 California Bar Exam. Defendants have opposed plaintiff’s request noting that her
19
request is misleading and fails to show good cause. Nevertheless, defendants state that in the event the
20
Court does not dismiss the case, defendants would not seek to impose deadlines that interfere with
21
plaintiff’s bar exam preparations. Therefore, for good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS plaintiff’s
22
request for an extension to file her amended complaint no later than April 1, 2013. The Court will not
23
be inclined to entertain additional requests for extensions of time. Any existing dates are hereby
24
VACATED.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: January 23, 2013
27
28

SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge