Rodriguez v. Downey Savings & Loan Association F.A. et al

Filing 52

ORDER REQUESTING PRECIS (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JUAN RODRIGUEZ, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 No. C 12-00989 WHA Plaintiff, v. ORDER REQUESTING PRECIS DOWNEY SAVING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. / 16 17 Plaintiff proceeding pro se has submitted a motion requesting clarification on the “limits 18 on [d]iscovery” that fails to clearly identify the parties’ present dispute (Dkt. No. 50). The 19 nature of the dispute also cannot be gleaned from parties’ joint Rule 26 discovery plan (Dkt. No. 20 51). The parties shall submit a joint précis of the current dispute by FEBRUARY 4 AT NOON. If 21 necessary, a hearing on the dispute or other steps will be set forth in a subsequent order. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 28, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?