Rodriguez v. Downey Savings & Loan Association F.A. et al
Filing
52
ORDER REQUESTING PRECIS (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2013)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JUAN RODRIGUEZ,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
No. C 12-00989 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER REQUESTING PRECIS
DOWNEY SAVING AND LOAN
ASSOCIATION, et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
Plaintiff proceeding pro se has submitted a motion requesting clarification on the “limits
18
on [d]iscovery” that fails to clearly identify the parties’ present dispute (Dkt. No. 50). The
19
nature of the dispute also cannot be gleaned from parties’ joint Rule 26 discovery plan (Dkt. No.
20
51). The parties shall submit a joint précis of the current dispute by FEBRUARY 4 AT NOON. If
21
necessary, a hearing on the dispute or other steps will be set forth in a subsequent order.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: January 28, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
