Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman & Apprentice Training Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al

Filing 18

ORDER granting 17 MOTION to Continue CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund and its Joint Board of Trustees, Les Proteau, et al. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 10/12/2012 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/6/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2012)

Download PDF
Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) 1 Blake E. Williams, Esq. (SBN 233158) SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 2 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 San Francisco, CA 94104 3 (415) 882-7900 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile 4 mstafford@sjlawcorp.com bwilliams@sjlawcorp.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BAY AREA PAINTERS AND TAPERS 10 PENSION TRUST FUND, et al., 11 PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; and ORDER THEREON Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 JIMMY CHARLES WINCHESTER, individually and dba JIM’S PAINTING & 14 PAPERING SERVICE aka JIM’S PAINTING, 15 Case No.: C12-0994 CRB Defendant. 16 Date: Friday, August 10, 2012 Time: 8:30 a.m. Ctrm: 6, 17th Floor 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California Judge: The Honorable Charles R. Breyer 17 18 Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Case Management Conference currently scheduled 19 for August 10, 2012, at 8:30 a.m., be continued for approximately 30 – 60 days, as follows: 20 1. As the Court’s records will reflect, this action was filed on February 27, 2012 to 21 compel Defendant to submit payment for amounts found due on an audit of their payroll records 22 during the period of August 1, 2008 through June 30, 2011, and to submit contribution reports and 23 payments for the months of July 2011 through December 2011. Service on Defendant was 24 completed on March 11, 2012. A Proof of Service of Summons was filed with the Court on 25 March 21, 2012. [Docket No. 9.] 26 27 28 -1REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC Case No.: C12-0994 CRB N:\pdf docs\1590behjou.docx 1 2. On May 30, 2012, the Clerk of the Court contacted this office to inquire about the 2 status of the case. Plaintiffs stated that we expect to file a Motion for Default Judgment within 3 sixty (60) days. 4 3. On or about March 29, 2012, Defendant sent a letter to Plaintiffs’ counsel to refute 5 the findings of the audit. He stated that he had paid the travel time and gas mileage portion of the 6 audit along with the wages. Plaintiffs contacted Defendant for proof of payment. 7 4. Defendant finally submitted the requested documentation within the past few days, 8 and Plaintiffs are in the process of forwarding it to the fund auditor. Once the fund auditor 9 receives the documents, she will have to review and, if necessary, revise the audit report. 10 5. Plaintiffs want to be certain of the amount Defendant owes on the audit before 11 filing a Motion for Default Judgment. 12 6. Accordingly, Plaintiffs herein respectfully request that the Case Management 13 Conference, currently scheduled for August 10, 2012, be continued for 30 – 60 days to allow the 14 fund auditor sufficient time to review the additional documentation, revise the report (if 15 applicable), and allow Defendant a chance to pay, if necessary. If no payment is received, 16 Plaintiffs will file a Motion for Default Judgment. 17 7. There are no issues that need to be addressed by this Court at the currently 18 scheduled Case Management Conference. In the interest of conserving costs as well as the Court’s 19 time and resources, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court continue the currently scheduled 20 Case Management Conference. Dated: August 2, 2012 21 22 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION By: 23 24 /s/ Blake E. Williams Attorneys for Plaintiffs 25 26 27 28 -2REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC Case No.: C12-0994 CRB N:\pdf docs\1590behjou.docx 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 harles Judge C NO 9 RT 10 ER 12 er R. Brey A H 11 R NIA 8 D RDERE OO IT IS S FO 7 LI UNIT ED S RT U O Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the currently set Case 3 Management Conference is hereby continued to October 12, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. and all related deadlines are extended accordingly. 4 Date: August 6, 2012 ____________________________________ S DISTRICT 5 TE CHARLES R. BREYER C THE HONORABLE TA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 N F D IS T IC T O R C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC Case No.: C12-0994 CRB N:\pdf docs\1590behjou.docx 1 PROOF OF SERVICE: 2 I, the undersigned, declare: 3 I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 4 eighteen and not a party to this action. My business address is 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110, 5 San Francisco, California 94104. 6 On August 2, 2012, I served the following document(s) on the parties to this action in the 7 manner described below: PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT 8 CONFERENCE; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 9 XX 10 11 U MAIL, being familiar with the practice of this office for the collection and the processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service, and deposited in the United States Mail copies of the same to the business addresses as specified below, in a sealed envelope fully prepared. 12 To: Jimmy Charles Winchester individually and dba Jim’s Painting & Papering Service aka Jim’s Painting 9849 East Jahant Road Acampo, California 95220 13 14 15 16 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this 17 declaration was executed on this 2nd day of August, 2012, at San Francisco, California. 18 /s/ Qui X. Lu 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1PROOF OF SERVICE Case No.: C12-0994 CRB N:\pdf docs\1590behjou.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?