Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman & Apprentice Training Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al
Filing
18
ORDER granting 17 MOTION to Continue CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund and its Joint Board of Trustees, Les Proteau, et al. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 10/12/2012 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/6/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2012)
Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509)
1 Blake E. Williams, Esq. (SBN 233158)
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
2 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110
San Francisco, CA 94104
3 (415) 882-7900
(415) 882-9287 – Facsimile
4 mstafford@sjlawcorp.com
bwilliams@sjlawcorp.com
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
BAY AREA PAINTERS AND TAPERS
10 PENSION TRUST FUND, et al.,
11
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR
CONTINUANCE OF CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; and
ORDER THEREON
Plaintiffs,
12
v.
13 JIMMY CHARLES WINCHESTER,
individually and dba JIM’S PAINTING &
14 PAPERING SERVICE aka JIM’S PAINTING,
15
Case No.: C12-0994 CRB
Defendant.
16
Date: Friday, August 10, 2012
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Ctrm: 6, 17th Floor
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, California
Judge: The Honorable Charles R. Breyer
17
18
Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Case Management Conference currently scheduled
19 for August 10, 2012, at 8:30 a.m., be continued for approximately 30 – 60 days, as follows:
20
1.
As the Court’s records will reflect, this action was filed on February 27, 2012 to
21 compel Defendant to submit payment for amounts found due on an audit of their payroll records
22 during the period of August 1, 2008 through June 30, 2011, and to submit contribution reports and
23 payments for the months of July 2011 through December 2011. Service on Defendant was
24 completed on March 11, 2012. A Proof of Service of Summons was filed with the Court on
25 March 21, 2012. [Docket No. 9.]
26
27
28
-1REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC
Case No.: C12-0994 CRB
N:\pdf docs\1590behjou.docx
1
2.
On May 30, 2012, the Clerk of the Court contacted this office to inquire about the
2 status of the case. Plaintiffs stated that we expect to file a Motion for Default Judgment within
3 sixty (60) days.
4
3.
On or about March 29, 2012, Defendant sent a letter to Plaintiffs’ counsel to refute
5 the findings of the audit. He stated that he had paid the travel time and gas mileage portion of the
6 audit along with the wages. Plaintiffs contacted Defendant for proof of payment.
7
4.
Defendant finally submitted the requested documentation within the past few days,
8 and Plaintiffs are in the process of forwarding it to the fund auditor. Once the fund auditor
9 receives the documents, she will have to review and, if necessary, revise the audit report.
10
5.
Plaintiffs want to be certain of the amount Defendant owes on the audit before
11 filing a Motion for Default Judgment.
12
6.
Accordingly, Plaintiffs herein respectfully request that the Case Management
13 Conference, currently scheduled for August 10, 2012, be continued for 30 – 60 days to allow the
14 fund auditor sufficient time to review the additional documentation, revise the report (if
15 applicable), and allow Defendant a chance to pay, if necessary. If no payment is received,
16 Plaintiffs will file a Motion for Default Judgment.
17
7.
There are no issues that need to be addressed by this Court at the currently
18 scheduled Case Management Conference. In the interest of conserving costs as well as the Court’s
19 time and resources, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court continue the currently scheduled
20 Case Management Conference.
Dated: August 2, 2012
21
22
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON
LAW CORPORATION
By:
23
24
/s/
Blake E. Williams
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
25
26
27
28
-2REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC
Case No.: C12-0994 CRB
N:\pdf docs\1590behjou.docx
1 IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
harles
Judge C
NO
9
RT
10
ER
12
er
R. Brey
A
H
11
R NIA
8
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
FO
7
LI
UNIT
ED
S
RT
U
O
Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the currently set Case
3 Management Conference is hereby continued to October 12, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. and all related
deadlines are extended accordingly.
4
Date: August 6, 2012
____________________________________
S DISTRICT
5
TE CHARLES R. BREYER
C
THE HONORABLE
TA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC
Case No.: C12-0994 CRB
N:\pdf docs\1590behjou.docx
1
PROOF OF SERVICE:
2 I, the undersigned, declare:
3
I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of
4 eighteen and not a party to this action. My business address is 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110,
5 San Francisco, California 94104.
6
On August 2, 2012, I served the following document(s) on the parties to this action in the
7 manner described below:
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT
8
CONFERENCE; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
9 XX
10
11
U
MAIL, being familiar with the practice of this office for the collection and the processing
of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service, and deposited in the
United States Mail copies of the same to the business addresses as specified below, in a
sealed envelope fully prepared.
12 To:
Jimmy Charles Winchester
individually and dba Jim’s Painting & Papering Service
aka Jim’s Painting
9849 East Jahant Road
Acampo, California 95220
13
14
15
16
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this
17 declaration was executed on this 2nd day of August, 2012, at San Francisco, California.
18
/s/
Qui X. Lu
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1PROOF OF SERVICE
Case No.: C12-0994 CRB
N:\pdf docs\1590behjou.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?